Ocl India Limited vs. Andrew Yule And Co. Ltd. . Through Managing Director

¢ITEM NO.19 COURT NO.1 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).9083/2011 (From the judgement and order dated 06/12/2010 in WP No.8154/2010 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) OCL INDIA LIMITED Petitioner(s) VERSUS ANDREW YULE & CO.LTD.& ORS. Respondent(s) (With prayer for interim relief) Date: 18/04/2011 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. PANICKER RADHAKRISHNAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SWATANTER KUMAR For Petitioner(s) Mr. Harish N. Salve,Sr.Adv. Mr. K.V. Bishwanathan,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ajay Bhargava,Adv. Ms. Vanita Bhargava,Adv. Mr. Atul Sankar Mathur,Adv. Mr. Rajeev Bhatnagar,Adv. for M/s. Khaitan & Co.,Advs. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R The petitioner has filed an additional affidavit dated 11th April, 2011, in Court today. We reproduce Paragraph 4 of the said affidavit: ....2/- - 2 - "That the Petitioner is not a party

within the purview of Section 19(1) of the SICA for the purpose of sacrificing its dues. Yet, the BIFR made the scheme binding on the Petitioner affecting the rights to realise the unchallenged award as a decretal dues. The same was the first ground taken by the Petitioner before the High Court."

In view of the said Paragraph 4, we issue notice.

Dasti service, in addition, is permitted.

[ Alka Dudeja ] [ Madhu Saxena ] A.R.-cum-P.S. Assistant Registrar