eCourtsIndiaBeta

Transmission Corporation Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd. vs. The Jeypore Sugar Company Ltd.

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judges:Hon'ble Kurian Joseph, Hon'ble Rohinton Fali Nariman
Case Type:Civil Appeal
Reg no:3580/2016
Filing no:8302/2016
CNR:SCIN010083022016

Parties & Advocates

Petitioner

1
Transmission Corporation Of Andhra Pradesh Ltd.

Petitioner Advocate

1
Guntur Prabhakar

Respondent

1
The Jeypore Sugar Company Ltd.

Case History with Orders

Disposed

Final Status

11 Jan 2017

Order(3) - 11 Jan 2017

ROP

4 Apr 2016

Order(2) - 4 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

Order(1) - 4 Apr 2016

ROP - of Main Case

1 Apr 2016

Case Registered

Registration No: 3580/2016

4 Mar 2016

Case Filed

4 Mar 2016 Filing No: 8302/2016

Interlocutory Applications (IA) (1)

1/2016
Particular: CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL
Filed by: MR. GUNTUR PRABHAKAR
Filing Date: 2016-04-01

Tagged Matters (2)

7669/2016(29-03-2016 12:17 PM)C.A. No. 003579 / 2016 Registered on 29-03-2016D No. 007669 / 2016 Registered on 29-03-2016 - CA

Petitioner: M/S TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD
Respondent: M/S E.I.D. PARRY (INDIA ) LTD
Type: M•Status: P•Entry: 01-04-2016

8302/2016(01-04-2016 12:29 PM)C.A. No. 003580 / 2016 Registered on 01-04-2016D No. 008302 / 2016 Registered on 01-04-2016 - CA

Petitioner: M/S. TRANSMISSION CORPORATION OF ANDHRA PRADESH LTD.
Respondent: M/S. THE JEYPORE SUGAR COMPANY LTD.
Type: C•Status: P•Entry: 01-04-2016

Earlier Court Details (5)

Court:
State Agency
State:
DELHI
Case No:
AN-285-2014
Order Date:
2015-10-29
Judgment Challenged:
No
Judgment Type:
-
Court:
State Agency
State:
DELHI
Case No:
APP-73-2014
Order Date:
2015-09-09
Judgment Challenged:
No
Judgment Type:
-
Court:
State Agency
State:
DELHI
Case No:
APP-286-2014
Order Date:
2015-10-29
Judgment Challenged:
No
Judgment Type:
-
Court:
State Agency
State:
DELHI
Case No:
APP-287-2014
Order Date:
2015-10-29
Judgment Challenged:
Yes
Judgment Type:
Final
Court:
State Agency
State:
DELHI
Case No:
APP-285-2014
Order Date:
2015-10-29
Judgment Challenged:
No
Judgment Type:
-

Share This Case

Similar Case Search
Case Content Last Updated22 Aug 2025, 9:35 am IST