Ansari Mohd Tahir Mohd Sadique vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble M.M. Sundresh
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
28 Mar 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.16 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IX | ||
|---|---|---|
| SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<br><b>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS</b> | ||
| Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.5215/2022 | ||
| Bombay) | (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 09-03-2022<br>in WP(L) No.6855/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at | |
| ANSARI MOHD TAHIR MOHD SADIQUE | <b>VERSUS</b> | Petitioner(s) |
| THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. | Respondent(s) | |
| <b>JUDGMENT</b> | (IA No.43644/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED<br>IA No.43645/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.<br>IA No.43648/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT ) | |
| Date : 28-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. | ||
| CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH | ||
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sunil Fernandes, Adv.<br>Mr. Ameet Mehta, Adv.<br>Mr. Rajendra Mishra, Adv.<br>Ms. Nupur Kumar, AOR<br>Mr. Prastut Dalvi, Adv.<br>Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Adv.<br>Ms. Ashwini Patil, Adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mrs. B. Sunita Rao, AOR<br>Mr. Gunmaya Singh Mann, Adv. | |
| Signature Not Verified<br>Digitally sig<br>RĂSHI GUPTA<br>Date: 202 <del>2.</del> 03.28<br>16:53:28 IST<br>Reason: | Mr. Chander Uday Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Pratap Venugopal, Adv.<br>Mr. Chetan Kapadia, Adv.<br>Mr. Pratik Shah, Adv.<br>Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv.<br>Mr. Akhil Abraham Roy, Adv.<br>Mr. Vijay Valsan, Adv.<br>M/s. K. K. John & Co. |
$\overline{1}$
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
The proceedings initiated by the petitioner are an oblique method to somehow prevent eviction in pursuance to a redevelopment plan and thus does not call for any interference by this Court.
The special leave petition is dismissed.
Pending applications stand disposed of.
A copy of the Order be placed before the Learned Bench dealing with the matter in the High Court of Bombay forthwith.
(RASHMI DHYANI) (POONAM VAID) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER