Electrosteel Castings Limited vs. Uv Asset Reconstruction Company Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble M.R. Shah, Hon'ble B.V. Nagarathna
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed as withdrawn
Listed On:
25 Mar 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2044 OF 2022
ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED Appellant(s)
VERSUS
UV ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED Respondent(s)
O R D E R
Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned Senior Advocate, appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal.
Permission is, accordingly, granted.
The Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
However, it goes without saying and even as observed by the NCLAT, the proceedings under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (for short 'IBC') shall be decided in accordance with law and on its own merits and all the contentions which may be available to the respective parties are kept open to be considered in the proceedings under Section 7 of the IBC.
.......................... J. (M.R. SHAH)
.......................... J. (B.V. NAGARATHNA)
New Delhi; March 25, 2022.
ITEM NO.34 Court 12 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 2044/2022
ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LIMITED Appellant(s)
VERSUS
UV ASSET RECONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED Respondent(s)
(IA No.39949/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.39948/2022-STAY APPLICATION)
Date : 25-03-2022 This appeal was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V. NAGARATHNA
For Appellant(s) | Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. | ||
---|---|---|---|
Mr. Neeraj Kishan Kaul, Sr. Adv. | |||
Mr. Vikas Mehta, AOR | |||
Ms. Bansuri Swaraj, Adv. | |||
Mr. Rajat Sehgal, Adv. | |||
Ms. Aarzoo Aneja, Adv. | |||
Mr. Ramchandra Madan, Adv. | |||
Mr. Bhaskar Nayak, Adv. | |||
Mr. Apoorv Khator, Adv. | |||
Mr. Adith Nair, Adv. | |||
Ms. Akanksha Vigyan, Adv. | |||
For Respondent(s) | Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. | ||
Mr. Huzefa Ahmadi, Sr. Adv. | |||
Mr. Dhruv Dewan, Adv. | |||
Ms. Chandni Ghatak, Adv. | |||
Mr. Mishra Saurabh, AOR | |||
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the signed order.
(R. NATARAJAN) (NISHA TRIPATHI) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER (Signed order is placed on the file)