New Delhi Municipal Council vs. Manju Tomar
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
âITEM NO.42 & 54 COURT NO.5 SECTION XIV S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petitions for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No.10383- 10384/2010 (From the judgments and orders dated 09/12/2009 and 08/02/2010 in LPA No. 441/2009 & LPA No. 442/2009 and CM No. 1355/2010 in LPA no. 441/2009 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI) NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MANJU TOMAR & ORS. ETC. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions and office report) WITH SLP(C) NO. 10969-10971 of 2010 (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c of the impugned judgment and with prayer for interim relief and office report) Date: 09/05/2011 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.L. DATTU For Petitioner(s) SLP(C)10383-10384/10 Mr. Sanjib Sen, Adv. Ms. Charu Ambwani, Adv. Mr. Ujjal Banerjee, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar,Adv. SLP(C)10969-10971/10 & r-6 in SLP 10383-10384/10 Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, Adv. Mr. Raj Kamal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Anitha Shenoy,Adv. Rr 1 to 5 in SLP 10383-10384/10 Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv. Ms. Mamta Saxena, Adv. Ms. Soumya Ray, Adv. ...2/- :2: UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(C) NO.10383-10384/2010 As per the office report, respondent No.7 still remains to be served. Although in the memorandum of parties, the said respondent has been arrayed as performa respondent, but Mr. K.T.S. Tulsi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for respondent No.6 submits that the presence of the said respondent would be necessary at the time of final disposal of the case. Accordingly,
we | direct | that | fresh | notice | shall | issue | to |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
respondent No.7. | Dasti, in addition. |
SLP(C) NO.10969-10971/2010
Issue notice.
Mr. Prashant Kumar, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 3 & 4 (In SLP Nos. 10969 & 10971/10) and respondent Nos. 2 & 3 (in SLP Nos.10970/10), Mr. Sanjay Parikh, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 & 5 to 8 (in SLP Nos.10969/10 & 10971/10), respondent Nos. 4 to 10 (in SLP No.10970/10), and seek time to file counter affidavit. Let counter affidavit on behalf of the respondents be filed within eight weeks.
List thereafter.
(VINOD LAKHINA) (KUSUM GULATI) Court Master Court Master