The State Of Odisha vs. Satyanarayan Nanda
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. SURINDER S. RATHI
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 33638/2018
THE STATE OF ODISHA & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
NIKUNJA BIHAR MOHAPATRA Respondent(s)
(only SLP(C) Nos. 33639 and 33640 of 2018 are to be listed before the Court of the Ld. Registrar. )
WITH
SLP(C) No. 33639/2018 (XI-A)
SLP(C) No. 33640/2018 (XI-A)
Diary No(s). 31543/2019 (XI-A) (As per Hon'ble Court's order dated 20.09.2019, this matter be listed for Hon'ble Court after receiving of the compliance report from the Chief Secretary of Odisha. Now this matter is listed for Ld. Registrar Court for service compliance. IA No. 138990/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 138991/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)
Date : 14-11-2019 This petition was called on for hearing today.
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, AOR Mr. Shibashish Misra, AOR Mr. S. Debabrata Reddy, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
- Mr. Rahul Pratap, AOR Mr. Suchit Mohanty, Adv.
- Mr. Nagarkatti Kartik Uday, AOR
- Ms. Laimon Rani Boro, Adv.
- Mr. Santosh Kumar I, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Appearance :Ld. counsel for petitioner is present. Ld. Counsel for respondent is present.
ITEM NO.34 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XI-A
SLP(C) No. 33639/2018
Respondent No. 1 has already filed the Counter Affidavit.
Despite grant of last opportunity, Ld. counsel for the petitioner has not taken requisite steps and also failed to furnish fresh particulars for effecting service upon respondent No. 2 and 3. Matter be, therefore, processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further orders.
SLP(C) No. 33640/2018
Respondent No. 1 has already filed the Counter Affidavit.
Service of notice is complete on Respondent No. 2 but no one has chosen to enter appearance on his behalf.
Despite grant of last opportunity, Ld. counsel for the petitioner has not taken requisite steps and also failed to furnish fresh particulars for effecting service upon respondent No. 3.
Matter be, therefore, processed for listing before the Hon'ble Judge in Chambers for further orders.
SURINDER S. RATHI Registrar
pm