Union Of India vs. Cen. For Pil

ITEM NO.MM COURT NO.5 SECTION PIL S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS REVIEW PETITION (C) NO(s). 748-749 OF 2012 IN W.P(C) 423/2010 AND W.P.(C)NO.10/2011 UNION OF INDIA Petitioner(s) VERSUS CEN.FOR PIL & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing c/c and office report) Date: 20/04/2012 These Petitions were called on for mentioning today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S. SINGHVI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA For Petitioner (s) Mr.Wasim A.Qadri, Adv. (Mentioned by) Mr. D.S. Mahra, A.O.R.(Not Present) For Respondent Mr.Prashant Bhushan, Adv. UPON being mentioned, the Court made the following O R D E R Shri Wasim A. Qadri, learned counsel for the petitioner made a mention and sought permission of the Court to file amended cause title by stating that due to mistake it could not be pointed out to the Court that notice is required to be issued only to respondent Nos. 1 to 11. In view of the statement of Shri Qadri, we direct that order dated 13.4.2012 shall be read as under :- "Issue notice to respondent Nos. 1 to 11 only with reference to the grounds B to F of Review Petition No.748 of 2012. Shri Prashant Bhushan accepts notice. Notice to the respondent in Review 2 Petition No. 749 of 2012 be issued, returnable on 01.05.2012. Dasti, in addition, is permitted. List on 01.05.2012. To be taken up at 2.00 p.m. It is made clear that issue of notice on the review petition would not operate as stay of the directions

contained in para 81 of judgment dated

1

02.02.2012. "

The Registry to take necessary steps.

Court Master Court Master

(Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Phoolan Wati Arora)