Jaipur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Ltd vs. Sks Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
IA
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Stage:
ORDERS (INCOMPLETE MATTERS / IAs / CRLMPs)
Remarks:
List before court/bench [list I.As.17045/21 and 17027/21 in both matters will be listed before the regular bench with appeal]
Listed On:
19 Apr 2021
In:
Chamber
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
17045/2021,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.23 Court 14 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Civil Appeal No(s). 1937/2020
JAIPUR VIDYUT VITARAN NIGAM LTD. & ORS. Appellant(s)
VERSUS
SKS POWER GENERATION (CHHATTISGARH) LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s) (ONLY I.A. NO. 17045/2021 is to be listed. IA No. 17045/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)
WITH
C.A. No. 2721/2020 (XVII) (only I.A No. 17027/2021 is to be listed. IA No. 17027/2021 - INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT)
Date : 19-04-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.R. GAVAI [IN CHAMBER]
| For Appellant(s) | Mr. C. Aryama Sundaram, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. M.G. Ramachandran, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Anand K. Ganesan, Adv.<br>Mr. Nikunj Dayal, AOR<br>Ms. Swapna Seshadri, Adv.<br>Mr. Shubham Arya, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Adv.<br>Mr. Rajesh Goyal, AOR |
| Mr. Atul Shanker Mathur, Adv.<br>Ms. Priya Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Prabal Mehrotra, Adv.<br>Mr. Umang Katariya, Adv.<br>M/S.Khaitan & Co., AOR<br>Ms. Vanita Bhargava, AOR | |
| Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta, AOR<br>Ms. Himanshi Andley, Adv. | |
| Ms. Prerna Singh, Adv.<br>Mr. Ravi Kishore, Adv.<br>Mr. Guntur Pramod Kumar, Adv. |
Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, AOR
Mr. Umesh Kumar Khaitan, AOR Ms. Sunita Sharma, Adv. Mr. G.S. Makkar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Mr. C. A. Sundaram, learned senior counsel appearing for the appellants though raises a serious objection with regard to the locus of the applicants for impleadment or intervention in the present appeals, he fairly states that it will be in the fitness of things that applications for impleadment / intervention are considered by the Bench while hearing the main appeals.
Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants states that since the outcome of the writ petition filed by the applicant before the Rajasthan High Court is likely to be affected by the decision in the present appeal, applicants applications for impleadment / intervention needs to be considered.
In my view since Mr. C. A. Sundaram, learned senior counsel has fairly stated that though he has objection with regard to the locus of the applicants, the issue regarding permitting the applicants to be impleaded or to intervene should be considered while hearing the appeal, no orders are necessary to be passed at this stage.
The parties are at liberty to raise contentions before the Regular Bench when the appeals are heard.
(NEETA SAPRA) (BEENA JOLLY)
-2-