Federal Bank Ltd vs. Rakesh Mohan Sharma
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
21 Jul 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
LISTED ON: 07.05.2015 BEFORE REGISTRAR COURT NO: 1 ITEM NO: 110
SECTION:XIV IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6694 & 6777/2014
Deepali Sharma ...Appellant
Versus
The Federal Bank Ltd. ...Respondent
OFFICE REPORT
It is submitted that there is sole respondent in these appeals. Service of notice of lodgment of petition of appeal is complete on the sole respondent in both the appeals and are represented by M/s. P. I. Jose and T. L. Garg, Advocates respectively.
It is further submitted that counsel for the parties have not filed statement of case so far and as per proviso Rule 32(2) of Order XIX of new SCR 2013 read as, "if the appellant does not file a statement of case within the time, as provided for in sub rule (1), it shall be presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to file any further statement of case". "Provided that where a respondent, who has entered appearance, does not file a statement of case whthin the time, as provided in sub-rule (1), it shall be presumed that the respondent does not desire to lodge statement of case in the appeal."
The appeals above mentioned are listed before the Court of Ld. Registrar with this office report for pre-final hearing.
DATED THIS THE 5th DAY OF MAY, 2015.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
COPY TO:
- Mr. T. L. Garg, Adv. Ch. No. 2. Mr. P. I. Jose, Adv. Ch. No.
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR