Nirmal vs. Gunwant Kaur Sethi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 Apr 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
1
ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.9 SECTION XIV
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No. 7675/2024
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-02-2024 in RCREV No. 91/2022 passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi)
NIRMAL Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
GUNWANT KAUR SETHI Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and IA No.95379/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING / CURING THE DEFECTS)
Date : 26-04-2024 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL
For Petitioner(s)
Mr. Nitin Gupta, Adv. Mr. Sahil Chopra, Adv. Ms. Filza Moonis, AOR Ms. Aadrisha Malhotra, Adv. Ms. Unnati Balyan, Adv. Mr. Aayush Chauhan, Adv.
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Delay in refiling is condoned.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we are
not inclined to entertain this special leave petition.
Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed.
At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
Reason:
some time to vacate the premises. In the facts and circumstances of the case, we direct that the suit premises shall be vacated by the petitioner on or before 31.10.2024 subject to payment of arrears of rent within one month and regular rent on month to month basis. The petitioner shall hand over the vacant possession of the suit premises to the respondent on or before 31.10.2024 and shall not part with or create third party right therein. In case of noncompliance of any of the aforesaid conditions by the petitioner, the respondent will be at liberty to execute the decree.
The petitioner shall file a usual undertaking in this regard within a period of two weeks from today before the Registrar, High Court of Delhi. The violation of the aforesaid terms would be treated as noncompliance of the order of this Court.
Ordered accordingly.
(NIDHI AHUJA) (VIRENDER SINGH) AR-cum-PS BRANCH OFFICER