Odisha Power Transmission Corp. Ltd vs. Sushil Kumar Nayak

Z ITEM NO.69 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XIA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11569/2014 ODISHA POWER TRANSMISSION CORP.LTD & ANR Petitioner(s) VERSUS SUSHIL KUMAR NAYAK & ANR Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for intervention and permission to file additional documents) WITH SLP(C) No. 11571-11640/2014 (With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 09/12/2014 This petition was called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr.Elangbin P.S.,adv. Mr. Raj Kumar Mehta,Adv. Mr.Sun For Respondent(s) Mr. Anil Kumar Tandale,Adv. Mr. Mohit D. Ram,Adv. Mr. Shibashish Misra,Adv. Mr. Sudhansu Palo,Adv. Mr.Hitendra Nath Rath,adv. Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao,Adv. Mr.Soumyajit Pani,adv. Mr.Vinodh Kanna,B.,adv. Mr.Ashok Panigrahi,adv. Mr.Santosh Kumar,adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Signature Not Verified SLP(C) No.11569/2014 Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2014.12.10 16:36:19 IST Reason: The office report indicates that the respondent No. 1 has already filed the counter affidavit. The respondent No.2 shall file .....2 ITEM NO.69 -2 the counter affidavit within a period of four weeks, whereafter no further extension shall be provided. SLP(C) No.11571-11640/2014 Ld.counsel for the respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.11569/14 has

stated that he has entered appearance on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1,3,5,6-9, 11-13, 15,16, 18, 20, 21, 30, 31, 33, 36-39,45, 47, 48, 50, 53-56, 58-61, 65, 66, 68 & 69 and he has filed a letter stating therein that these respondents adopt the counter affidavit filed by the respondent No.1 in SLP(C) No.11569/14. Office shall verify the position and report accordingly. The service position of the other respondents shall also be detailed in the office report. List again on 12.12.2014.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB