T. Govindaraj& Ors. vs. R. Subrathinam& Ors.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 Nov 2010
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| SUPREME COURT OF INDIA<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS |
|---|
| BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MRS. RACHNA GUPTA |
| Civil Appeal No(s). 10358-10361/2010 |
| T. GOVINDARAJ & ORS.<br>Appellant(s) |
| VERSUS |
| R. SUBRATHINAM & ORS.<br>Respondent(s) |
| WITH |
| C.A. No. 5566/2014<br>(With appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) |
| Date: 26/03/2015 These appeals were called on for hearing today. |
| For Appellant(s)<br>Ms. L.R. Sumathy, Adv.<br>Ms. E. R. Sumathy, Adv.<br>Ms. N. Shoba, Adv. |
| For Respondent(s)<br>Ms. N. Shoba, Adv. |
| UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following<br>ORDER |
REGISTRAR COURT. 1
SECTION XII
C.A. No. $5566/2014$
ITEM NO.102
Deleted.
C.A.No.10358-10361/2010
Service of all 9 respondents in the matter is complete. However, parties have not filed the statement of case. Since it Signal We Mot Ve first more a mandate after the amendment in the Supreme Court and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2}$ and $\frac{1}{2$ Read Kulles, 2013 and in that circumstance, the List of dates already submitted is presumed to have been accepted by the parties.
The appeal stands complete, in the given circumstances.
Registry to process to list the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.
(RACHNA GUPTA) Registrar