IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION

CONTEMPT PETITION (C) NO. 1749 OF 2018

IN

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2703 OF 2017

HARI SHANKAR PRASAD PETITIONER (S)

VERSUS

SUDHIR TRIPATHY & ORS. RESPONDENT (S)

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 1029 OF 2018

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 2157-2158 OF 2018

IN C.A. NO. 2788-2789 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 2193 OF 2018

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 2200 OF 2018

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 87 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 88 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 173-174 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2788-2789 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 313-314 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2788-2789 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 357 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 356 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 364-365 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2788-2789 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 362-363 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2788-2789 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 360-361 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2788-2789 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 371 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 369 OF 2019

IN C.A. NO. 2703 OF 2017

O R D E R

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1749/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

The University has rejected the application of the petitioner since he has given wrong information regarding his Date of Birth and also on the ground of wrong information with regard to Matriculation examination. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is at liberty to question the same in appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum, since the order has been passed by the University considering the directions issued by this Court.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1029/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Since the payment has been released by the State as well as by the University, the matter has to be dealt with by the Principal. We direct the State to ensure that the payment is released within 15 days. We also direct the Principal to disburse the amount forthwith within the outer limit of 15 days. The Secretary of the concerned department shall also ensure that the payment is released.

In case the amount is not released after due verification within the stipulated time, we give liberty to the petitioner(s) to file fresh contempt petition.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped, notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2157-2158/2018 in C.A. No. 2788- 2789/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2193/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2200/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

There are four petitioners in this case.

It is stated that the case of Petitioner no. 1 – Ravi Ranjan Kumar Sinha has been rejected by the University. As such, he is free to avail the

appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped qua Petitioner No. 1 and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of qua Petitioner No. 1.

In respect of other petitioners, let the matter be listed on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 87/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Since there is a dispute as to the availability of the post that cannot be the subject matter of the case. As the University has rejected the absorption for want of availability of the post, it is open to the petitioner to question the same in accordance with law in appropriate proceedings.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 88/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

There are two petitioners in this case.

It is stated that the case of Gupta Singh has been rejected by the University. As such, he is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped qua Gupta Singh and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of qua Gupta

Singh.

In respect of other petitioner, let the matter be listed on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 173-174/2019 in C.A. No. 2788- 2789/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 313-314/2019 in C.A. No. 2788- 2789/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 357/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Notice is accepted by the respective counsel. It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved on the merits of the order as to the effective date of absorption, he/she is free to question the same in accordance with law before appropriate forum

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 356/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 364-365/2019 in C.A. No. 2788- 2789/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 362-363/2019 in C.A. No. 2788- 2789/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 360-361/2019 in C.A. No. 2788- 2789/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 371/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner(s) is/are aggrieved, they are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 369/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner(s) is/are aggrieved, they are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

.......................J. [ ARUN MISHRA ]

.......................J. [ MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR ]

.......................J. [ NAVIN SINHA ]

New Delhi; APRIL 02, 2019. ITEM NO.2 + 10 COURT NO.4 SECTION XVI

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

10

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 981/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

KAMESHWAR NATH PANDEY & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

ANJANI KUMAR SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION)

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1029/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1033-1034/2018 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1188/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.72107/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1742-1743/2018 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.116376/2018-EXEMPTION FROM APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL TRANSLATOR) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1749/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1755/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.137055/2018-EXEMPTION FROM APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL TRANSLATOR) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2157-2158/2018 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2193/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2195/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2199/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.175799/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2200/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.177190/2018-EXEMPTION FROM APPOINTMENT OF OFFICIAL TRANSLATOR and IA No.177205/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 87/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 88/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 103-104/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 111/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 115/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 116/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 117/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 173-174/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 319/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 313-314/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 315-316/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 317-318/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 357/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 356/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION[ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO. 7 I.E. CONT. PET. (C) NO. 832/2018 IN C.A. NO. 2703/2017 ]) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 358/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 359/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.32975/2019-PERMISSION TO FILE APPLICATION FOR DIRECTION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 364-365/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 362-363/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 360-361/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 370/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 379-380/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 373/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 371/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 369/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 372/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 378/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 377/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 376/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 382-391/2019 in C.A. No. 2706-2715/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 447/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.40147/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.40179/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING ANNEXTURES)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 466/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION) CONMT.PET.(C) No. 465/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.50371/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) with CONMT.PET.(C) No. 471-472/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.50913/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 473-474/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 475-476/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION)

MA 657/2019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 832/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.52369/2019-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.52368/2019-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION and IA No.52358/2019- APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 480/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION)

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 481/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 (XVI) (FOR ADMISSION)

Date : 02-04-2019 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN SINHA

Counsel for the

parties Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gopal Prasad, Adv.

Mr. Rakesh K. Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Prabhudh Singh Gaur, Adv. Mr. Aditya Pushkal Khanna, Adv. Ms. Shefali Jain, Adv. Ms. Ramya Khanna, Adv. Mr. Prakash Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Rashmi Khanna, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Prasad Singh, AOR Mr. S. Wasim A. Qadri, Sr. Adv. Mr. Zaid Ali Subzposh, Adv. Mr. Tamim Qadri, Adv. Mr. Saeed Qadri, Adv.

Ms. Udita Singh, Adv.

Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv. Mr. Rishi K. Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Yasharth Kant, Adv. Mr. Nishant, Adv. Mr. Neeraj, Adv. Mr. Rajeev Singh, Adv. Mr. Prabuddha Singh, Adv. Mr. Manish Kumar Saran, Adv. Mr. Bijay Kumar Sinha, Adv. Mr. Awanish Kumar, Adv. Dr. Anand Kumar, Adv. Mr. Satya Prakash Sharan, Adv. Mr. Devashish Bharukha, Adv. Mr. Ravi Bharuka, Adv. Ms. Sarvshree, Adv. Mr. Justine George, Adv. Mr. Aditya Singala, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Adv. Mr. Naik H.K., Adv. Ms. Padma Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Rajnish, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, Adv. Mr. Vijayalasmi Jha, Adv. Mr. Naveen Kumar Singh, Adv. Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, Adv. Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Adv. Ms. Prerna Kumari, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Aldanish Rein, Adv. Mr. Neeraj Shekhar, Adv. Mr. Animesh Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sumit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Thakur, Adv. Mr. Murari Kumar, Adv. Mr. Smarhar Singh, Adv.

Mr. Atul Jha, Adv. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Sinha, Adv.

Mr. Joby P. Varghese, Adv. Mr. Sangam Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ashish Pandey, Adv. Ms. Punam Kumari, Adv. Mr. Azmat H. Amanullah, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Jha, AOR Ms. Manjula Gupta, AOR Mr. Ashwarya Sinha, AOR Mr. Kanhaiya Priyadarshi, AOR Mr. Nirmal Kumar Ambastha, AOR Ms. Punam Kumari, AOR Mr. Santosh Kumar - I, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1742-1743/2018 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

As the matter is stated to be pending for the Cabinet approval, list on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1749/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

The University has rejected the application of the petitioner since he has given wrong information regarding his Date of Birth and also on the ground of wrong information with regard to Matriculation examination. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is at liberty to question the same in appropriate proceedings before appropriate forum, since the order has been passed by the University considering the directions issued by this Court.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

As the matter is stated to be pending for the Cabinet approval, list on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2199/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha, learned senior counsel, is not available today.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 115/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 116/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 319/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 981/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Let reply to the compliance report be filed by the petitioner(s) within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1029/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Since the payment has been released by the State as well as by the University, the matter has to be dealt with by the Principal. We direct the State to ensure that the payment is released within 15 days. We also direct the Principal to disburse the amount forthwith within the outer limit of 15 days. The Secretary of the concerned department shall also ensure that the payment is released.

In case the amount is not released after due verification within the stipulated time, we give liberty to the petitioner(s) to file fresh contempt petition.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped, notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1033-1034/2018 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is submitted by the learned counsel that the due amount has not been paid. We cannot go into the question whether they have been served or not. This enquiry has to be held by the concerned respondent(s), i.e. the State Government, University as well as by the Principal of the Institution. In case they have not served, obviously they cannot be claiming the salary for that period.

Let the due verification be made and the concerned respondent(s) file an affidavit in this Court as to the payment that has been made and whether that is in compliance of the order passed by this Court. The petitioner(s) may also file an affidavit as to what is the amount due and payable to them.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1188/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It has been pointed out by the State Government that the University has sent a report dated March, 2019 stating that the petitioner has submitted the papers on 30.03.2019. It has been submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner(s) that on earlier two occasions, the documents have been filed and wrong averment has been made.

Be that as it may, as the documents have been filed and the

order has to be complied with, let a compliance affidavit be filed by the respondent(s) within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2157-2158/2018 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2193/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped, notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2195/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

There is a dispute whether the amount has been paid or not. Accordingly, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to verify the same.

Let an affidavit be filed in this regard within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 2200/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

There are four petitioners in this case.

It is stated that the case of Petitioner no. 1 – Ravi Ranjan Kumar Sinha has been rejected by the University. As such, he is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped qua Petitioner No. 1 and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of qua Petitioner No. 1.

In respect of other petitioners, let the matter be listed on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 87/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Since there is a dispute as to the availability of the post that cannot be the subject matter of the case. As the University has rejected the absorption for want of availability of the post, it is open to the petitioner to question the same in accordance with law in appropriate proceedings.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 88/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

There are two petitioners in this case.

It is stated that the case of Gupta Singh has been rejected by the University. As such, he is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped qua Gupta Singh and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition stands disposed of qua Gupta Singh.

In respect of other petitioner, let the matter be listed on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 103-104/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 111/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 117/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Let the Principal make a verification about the period for which the petitioner has worked. The Principal as well as the University shall ensure that the payment is made for the period the petitioner has worked and a report to this effect be filed in this Court within four weeks from today.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 173-174/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 313-314/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 315-316/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

There is a dispute whether the arrears have been paid or not.

Accordingly, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to verify the same.

Let an affidavit be filed in this regard within four weeks. List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 317-318/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 357/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Notice is accepted by the respective counsel. It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved on the merits of the order as to the effective date of absorption, he/she is free to question the same in accordance with law before appropriate forum

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 356/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 358/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Notice is accepted by the respective counsel.

Reply to the petition be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 359/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Notice is accepted by the respective counsel.

Reply to the petition be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 364-365/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 362-363/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner is aggrieved, he/she is free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of. CONMT.PET.(C) No. 360-361/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

It is stated that the case of the petitioner(s) has been rejected by the State Government.

As such, the petitioner(s) is/are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petitions are disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 370/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 379-380/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 373/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 371/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner(s) is/are aggrieved, they are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 369/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

It is stated that the order has been substantially complied with. In case the petitioner(s) is/are aggrieved, they are free to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate forum in accordance with law.

In view of the above, contempt proceedings are dropped and the notice is discharged. The Contempt Petition is disposed of.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 372/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017 List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 378/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 377/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 376/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

List on 09.07.2019.

Reply, if any, be filed in the meantime.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 382-391/2019 in C.A. No. 2706-2715/2017

There is a dispute whether the amount has been paid or not. Accordingly, four weeks' time is granted to the learned counsel for the petitioner to verify the same.

Let an affidavit be filed in this regard within four weeks.

The State as well as the concerned respondent(s) shall also

look into the matter and file their affidavits in this regard.

List on 09.07.2019.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 447/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 466/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 465/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 471-472/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 473-474/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 475-476/2019 in C.A. No. 2788-2789/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

MA 657/2019 in CONMT.PET.(C) No. 832/2018 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 480/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 481/2019 in C.A. No. 2703/2017

Issue notice.

Reply, if any, be filed within four weeks.

List on 09.07.2019.

Personal presence of the alleged contemnor(s) is not necessary at this stage.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (JAGDISH CHANDER) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER (Signed order is placed on the file)