The State Of Maharashtra General Administration Department The Chief Secretary vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Home Affairs Its Cabinet Secretary

BITEM NO.3 COURT NO.1 SECTION IIIA

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

I.A. NOS.1-5 IN ORIGINAL SUIT NO.4 OF 2004

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Plaintiff(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ANR. Defendant(s)

(Appln. u/s 80(2) of the CPC for exempting from serving notice under Sec.80(1) CPC and for amendment of plaint under Order XXVI, Rule 8 of the SCR 1966 and for seeking further time to file additional written statement on behalf of defendant No.2 and for interim relief and for exemption from filing official translation and office report)

Date: 25/10/2007 This Petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.H. KAPADIA

For Plaintiff(s) Mr. Vasantrao Bhandare, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav,Adv. Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv. Mr. Brij Kishor Sah, Adv. Mr. Rahul Joshi, Adv.

• For Defendant(s) Mr. F.S. Nariman, Sr.Adv. Mr. Uday Holla, AG Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde,Adv. Mr. S.C. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Mohan V. Katarki, Adv. Mr. Amit Kr. Chawla, Adv.
• For intervenor: Ms. Triveni Poteker, Adv. Mr. Amit Singh, Adv. Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Adv.
• For UOI: Mr. T. Srinivasa Murthy, Adv. Mr. Devdatt Kamat, Adv. Mrs. Sushma Suri, Adv.

UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following ORDER

In I.A.No.1/2004: No orders are required on this application.

.....2/-

-2-

In I.A.No.2/2005:

I.A. is allowed subject to all contentions of the defendant.

In I.A.No.3/2005:

I.A. is allowed. Additional written statement taken on file. In I.A.No.4/2005:

Heard both sides. I.A. is closed.

In I.A.No.5/2006:

I.A. is allowed.

In I.A.No....../2007:

At the request of learned counsel for the applicant, the application is permitted to be withdrawn.

Original Suit No.4/2004:

For framing of issues, post the Suit in January, 2008.

Court Master Court Master

(N. Annapurna) (Pushap Lata Bhardwaj)