State Represented By Central Bureau Of Investigaion (Anti Corruption Branch) vs. Rajendra Kumar Jain
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
After Week/Month/Vacation
Before:
Hon'ble Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Prasanna B. Varale
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CRIMINAL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
9 Mar 2024
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.26 COURT NO.7 SECTION II-C
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) Nos.6092-6097/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 23-09-2022 in CRLRP No. 1475/2016 23-09-2022 in CRLRP No. 1476/2016 23-09-2022 in CRLRP No. 1477/2016 23-09-2022 in CRLRP No. 1478/2016 23-09-2022 in CRLRP No. 1479/2016 23-09-2022 in CRLRP No. 1486/2016 passed by the High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru)
STATE REPRESENTED BY CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (ANTI CORRUPTION BRANCH) Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RAJENDRA KUMAR JAIN & ANR. ETC.ETC. Respondent(s)
Date : 03-09-2024 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM NATH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANNA BHALACHANDRA VARALE
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G. (Not Present)<br>Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR<br>Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv.<br>Mr. Vatsal Joshi, Adv.<br>Mr. Annirudh Sharma Ii, Adv.<br>Mr. Ishaan Sharma, Adv.<br>Ms. Srishti Mishra, Adv.<br>Ms. Satvika Thakur, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Pallav Sishodia, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Bhargava V. Desai, Adv.<br>Mr. Shivam Sharma, Adv. |
| Mr. Sarim Naved, Adv.<br>Mr. Harsh Kumar, Adv.<br>Mr. Saurabh Sagar, Adv.<br>Ms. Sugandha Anand, AOR | |
| Mr. Nitin Ramesh, Adv.<br>Ms. Srishti Agnihotri, AOR<br>Ms. Sanjana Grace Thomas, Adv.<br>Ms. Tara Elizabeth Kurien, Adv. | |
| Ms. Shubhi Bhardwaj, Adv.<br>Ms. Manju Jetley, AOR<br>Mr. Mata Prasad Singh, Adv. |
Mr. Praveen Pathak, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Kr.Singh,Adv. Mr. Ayush P. Shah, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s). The Special Leave Petition(s) are, accordingly, dismissed.
Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of.
(NEETU KHAJURIA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS (RANJANA SHAILEY) COURT MASTER