Namrata Saini vs. Usha Devi @ Ram Devi
AI Summary
This Special Leave Petition, stemming from a High Court order, involves an appeal to the Supreme Court. On this date, the Supreme Court, through a Division Bench, simply adjourned the matter for two weeks based on a request from the respondent's counsel, indicating ongoing procedural steps in a case of significant importance to the involved parties.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
This Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 11378/2018 was filed by Namrata Saini against Usha Devi @ Ram Devi & Ors. It challenges an impugned final judgment and order dated October 3, 2017, passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh. On July 27, 2021, the Supreme Court, comprising Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indira Banerjee and Hon'ble Mr. Justice V. Ramasubramanian, heard the matter. Counsel for both sides were present. Based on a letter circulated by the learned counsel for the Respondent, the Court ordered an adjournment of the case for two weeks.
Timeline of Events
Underlying case (CR No. 5240/2016) was initiated or heard in the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh.
Impugned final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) was filed in the Supreme Court of India.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) was registered in the Supreme Court of India.
Supreme Court hearing, matter adjourned for two weeks upon the respondent's request.
Respondent's Arguments
The respondent's counsel submitted a letter requesting an adjournment of the matter.
Court's Reasoning
The Supreme Court decided to adjourn the matter for two weeks in response to the request made by the learned counsel for the Respondent, communicated via a circulated letter.
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.The matter is adjourned for two weeks.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a procedural order for adjournment and does not contain any substantive legal pronouncement or decision on merits, thus it holds no precedential value.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Indira Banerjee, Hon'ble V. Ramasubramanian
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Adjourned for [D:0,W:2,M:0]
Listed On:
27 Jul 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6 Court 10 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IV-B
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11378/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-10-2017 in CR No. 5240/2016 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
NAMRATA SAINI Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
USHA DEVI @ RAM DEVI & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 27-07-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR Ms. Manjeet Kirpal, Adv. Mr. Sunil Gupta, Adv.
- For Respondent(s) Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Shantwanu Singh, Adv. Ms. Pragya Singh, Adv. Mr. Vikram Jakhar, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
In terms of the letter circulated by the learned counsel for the Respondent, the matter is adjourned for two weeks.
(MANISH ISSRANI) (MATHEW ABRAHAM)
COURT MASTER(SH) COURT MASTER(NSH)
