Namrata Saini vs. Usha Devi @ Ram Devi

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Registrar (J) - Ii
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:1 Aug 2018
CNR:SCIN010069682018

AI Summary

In a crucial procedural step, the Supreme Court Registrar has granted the main respondents in a Special Leave Petition (Civil) four weeks to file their counter-affidavits. This order from August 2018 addresses the compliance of parties and ensures the next stage of the appeal against a High Court decision can proceed, highlighting the ongoing legal challenge.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:11378/2018
Case Type:Special Leave Petition (Civil)
Case Sub-Type:SLP - Civil Revision Appeal
Secondary Case Numbers:6968/2018, SCIN010069682018
Order Date:2018-08-01
Filing Year:2018
Court:Supreme Court of India
Bench:Registrar
Judges:Hon'ble Kapil Mehta

Petitioner's Counsel

Shakti Pandey
Advocate - Appeared
M. Y. Deshmukh
AOR - Appeared

Respondent's Counsel

Ashok Kumar Singh
AOR - Appeared

Advocates on Record

M. Y. Deshmukh
Ashok Kumar Singh

eCourtsIndia AITM

Brief Facts Summary

This order concerns a Special Leave Petition (Civil) where the Supreme Court Registrar heard the matter. Respondents 1 to 5 were granted four weeks to submit their counter-affidavits. It was noted that respondents 6 and 7 had been successfully served with notice but had not appeared before the court. The case was scheduled for another hearing on September 7, 2018.

Timeline of Events

2017-10-03

High Court of Punjab and Haryana passed order CR-5240-2016 (impugned order).

2018-02-21

Case filed in Supreme Court as a Special Leave Petition (Civil).

2018-04-27

Case registered as SLP(C) No. 11378/2018 and had its first hearing.

2018-08-01

Supreme Court Registrar hears the matter and issues the present order.

2018-08-01

Respondents 1-5 granted 4 weeks to file counter-affidavits.

2018-08-01

Service completed on Respondents 6&7, who did not appear.

2018-09-07

Next hearing date scheduled by the Registrar.

Key Factual Findings

Respondents 1 to 5 require and are granted four weeks' time to file their counter affidavit.

Source: Current Court Finding

Service of notice is complete on respondent Nos. 6 and 7.

Source: Current Court Finding

Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 have not entered appearance despite being served.

Source: Current Court Finding

Primary Legal Issues

1.Compliance with court directions regarding filing of counter-affidavits
2.Procedural advancement of a Special Leave Petition (Civil)

Secondary Legal Issues

1.Status of service of notice on respondents
2.Ensuring due process for all parties in appellate proceedings

Court's Reasoning

The Registrar granted four weeks' time to respondent Nos. 1 to 5 to file their counter-affidavits, reflecting adherence to principles of natural justice and providing adequate opportunity to all parties. The court also noted that service was complete on respondent Nos. 6 and 7, but they had not entered appearance, indicating that proceedings could continue against them.

Judicial Philosophy Indicators:
  • Emphasis on Natural Justice
  • Strict Adherence to Procedure
Order Nature:Procedural
Disposition Status:Pending

Impugned Orders

High Court of Punjab
Case: CR-5240-2016
Date: 2017-10-03

Specific Directions

  1. 1.Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 5 for filing counter affidavit.
  2. 2.List again on 7.9.2018.

Precedential Assessment

Non-Binding (Procedural)

This is a procedural order issued by a Registrar, not a substantive judgment by a bench of judges. It deals with case management and compliance, not legal principles.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Legal professionals must ensure strict compliance with procedural deadlines for filing documents, even at the Registrar's stage, to avoid delays or adverse orders.
2.It is imperative to confirm appearance for all served parties, as non-appearance can lead to the case proceeding ex-parte, potentially prejudicing the client's position.

Legal Tags

Supreme Court Procedural Order SLPCounter Affidavit Filing Deadline ExtensionService of Notice Compliance Supreme CourtRegistrar Court Directions Special Leave PetitionEnsuring Due Process in Supreme Court Appeals

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Ordinary

Stage:

SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)

Remarks:

List On (Date) [07-09-2018]

Listed On:

8 Jan 2018

In:

Registrar

Category:

UNKNOWN

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.70 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION IV-B

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR. KAPIL MEHTA

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11378/2018

NAMRATA SAINI Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

USHA DEVI @ RAM DEVI & ORS. Respondent(s)

Date : 01-08-2018 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s)

Mr. Shakti Pandey, Adv. Mr. M. Y. Deshmukh, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Four weeks' time is granted to respondent Nos.1 to 5 for filing counter affidavit.

Service is complete on respondent Nos.6 and 7 but none has entered appearance.

List again on 7.9.2018.

KAPIL MEHTA Registrar 01.08.2018

rd

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(7) - 29 Jan 2024

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(6) - 25 Aug 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(5) - 9 May 2022

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(4) - 27 Jul 2021

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(3) - 7 Sept 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(2) - 1 Aug 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing

Order(1) - 27 Apr 2018

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view