Buffalo Traders Welfare Association Through The General Secretary Shri Feerozuddin vs. Union Of India Ministry Of Agriculture Through Secretary
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
19 Feb 1996
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.301 | COURT NO. 9 | SECTION XIV |
|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS | I N D I A |
| CIVIL APPEAL | No. 3769 of 1996 | |
| BUFFALO TRADERS WELFARE ASSON. | Appellant (s) | |
| VERSUS | ||
| U O I & ORS | Respondent(s) | |
| and impleadment and office report) | (with I.A. No. 22,40,41 and I.A. No for intervention, directions | |
| WITH<br>CIVIL APPEAL No. 3774 of 1996 | ||
| CIVIL APPEAL No. 3773 of 1996 | ||
| CIVIL APPEAL No. 3771 of 1996 | ||
| WRIT PETITION © No. 452 of 1995<br>(with appln. for directions and stay) | ||
| CIVIL APPEAL No. 3772 of 1996 | ||
| CIVIL APPEAL No. 3770 of 1996<br>(with appln. for ex-parte stay) | ||
| WRIT PETITION No. D14793 OF 2000<br>(with office report) | ||
| WRIT PETITION © No. 192 OF 2004<br>(with appln. for directions and stay and office report) | ||
| Date: 05/05/2010 | These appeals were called on for hearing today. | |
| CORAM : | HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.S. SIRPURKAR<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CYRIAC JOSEPH<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK VERMA | |
| For Appearing<br>parties: | Mr. Shakil Ahmad Syed, Adv.<br>Mr. S.A. Saud, Adv. | |
| Mr. Ajay K. Jha, Adv.<br>M/s P.H.Parekh & Co.<br>2 | ||
| Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. | ||
| Mr. Bipin, Adv. | Mr. Shekhar Prit Jha, Adv. | |
| Mr.<br>Ch.<br>Ms.<br>Ms. | Wasim Qadri, Adv.<br>Shamsuddin Khan, Adv.<br>Rekha Pandey, Adv.<br>Anil Katiyar, Adv. |
Mr. B.S.Banthia, Adv.
Mr. Sanjiv Sen, Adv. Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. Ms. Anuja Chopra, Adv. Mr. D.N. Goburdhan, Adv. Mr. Praful Bagchi, Adv. Mr. Vishnu Saharya, Adv. for M/s Saharya & Co., Advs. Mr. Ameet Singh, Adv. Mr. Alka, Adv. Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Vijay Panjwani, Adv. Mr. Parshant Kumar, Adv. Ms. Sangeeta Kumar, Adv. Mr. K.R.Rajaseekaran Pillai, Adv. Mr. Mukesh K. Giri, Adv. (NP) Ms. Binu Tamta,Adv. Mr. Ashok K. Srivastava, Adv. Mr. K.C. Dua, Adv. Mr.Ramesh N.Keshwani, Adv. Mr. S.K.verma, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv. Mr.Sushil Kumar Jain, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following 3 O R D E R CIVIL APPEAL NOs. 3769 of 1996, 3774 of 1996, 3773 of 1996, 3771 of 1996, 3772 of 1996 3770 of 1996, W.P. © No. 192 OF 2004 AND W.P.(C) No. D14793 of 2000 None appeared on behalf of the petitioner in W.P.(C) No. D14793 of 2000. These civil appeals and writ petitions are disposed of as infructuous in terms of the signed order.
Writ Petition No. 452 of 1995:
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms of the signed order.
All the I.As. have become infructuous and are disposed of in terms of the signed order.
I.A. No....... in I.A. no. 42 in Civil Appeal No. 3769 of 1996:
The prayer of the applicants in this I.A. is that the land lying on the National Highway 24 at Ghazipur intersection, having an area of about 30 acres be allocated/given to the live stock market. The order dated 28.4.2010 passed by this court shall now be read as under: The prayer of the applicants in this I.A. is that the land lying on the National Highway 24 at Ghazipur intersection, having an area of about 30 acres be allocated/given to the live stock market/traders. 4 (Shashi Sareen) (Shashi Bala Vij) Court Master Court Master (Signed order is placed on the file) 5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 3769 OF 1996 BUFFALO TRADERS WELFARE ASSON. ... Appellant(s) Versus U.O.I. & ORS. ... Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3774 of 1996, 3773 of 1996, 3771 of 1996, 3772 of 1996 3770 of 1996, W.P. © No. 192 OF 2004 AND W.P.(C) No. D14793 of 2000 O R D E R Mr. Sanjiv Sen, learned counsel appearing for the M.C.D. submits that all these appeals have become infructuous as they relate to the shifting of slaughter house from Idgah to Ghazipur and the shifting is now complete in pursuance of the earlier orders passed by this court from time to time. This statement is not controverted by any of the counsel for the appellant. Accepting the statement made at the bar and after perusing the appeals and
This Court on 28.4.2010 passed the following order
in I.A. No. 42:
the writ petitions, they are disposed of as infructuous.
We hope that whatever undertakings have been given by the MCD in its earlier affidavits, the same shall be adhered to and sincere efforts shall be made to provide basic amenities in the slaughter house at Ghazipur. 6
W.P.(C) No. 452 of 1995:
Learned counsel appearing for the applicant seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition. Permission granted. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue such remedies as are available to the applicant in law.
I.A Nos. 22, 40, 41, 42 in Civil Appeal No. 3769/1996, I.A. No...... in Civil Appeal No. 3769 of 1996 (Buffalo Traders welfare Association Vs. Union of India and Ors.) and I.A. Nos. 2, 3 in Civil Appeal No. 3773 of 1996
In view of the order passed in Civil Appeals, these I.As have become infructuous and are disposed of accordingly.
...................J. (V.S.SIRPURKAR)
....................J. (CYRIAC JOSEPH)
...................J. (DEEPAK VERMA)
7
New Delhi, May 05, 2010.