Comptroller And Auditor General Of India Union Of India vs. Om Prakash
Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:26 Aug 2016
CNR:SCIN010069302015
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
26 Mar 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
SECTION-IV
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 6915 – 6921 OF 2015
Union of India & Ors. Etc. ....Appellants
VERSUS
Om Prakash & Ors. Etc. Etc. ...Respondents
OFFICE REPORT ON PRE-FINAL HEARING
The Office Report is prepared as per Circular No.F.41/Judl./2008 dated 17th December, 2008:-
- (a) There are 12, 5, 1, 3, 1, 1 and 1 respondents in C.A. Nos. 6915, 6916, 6917, 6918, 6919, 6920 and 6921 of 2015, respectively. SLP has been dismissed in respect of Respondent No. 9 in C.A. No. 6915 of 2015, Respondent No. 2 in C.A. No. 6916 of 2015 and Respondent No.1 in C.A. No. 6918 of 2015 vide this Court's Order dated 20.07.2015. The remaining Respondents in all the matters are represented through Mr. Amlan Kumar Ghosh, Advocate.
- (b) Original record in the appeal has not been requisitioned by this Hon'ble Court vide 08.12.2014.
- (c) Not applicable.
- (d) Not applicable.
- (e) No application for substitution is pending.
- (f) Counsel for Appellant as well as Respondents have not filed Statement of Case despite this Registry's letter dated 06.05.2016. In terms of Rule 32, Sub Rule-2 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the appellant has adopted the list of dates/synopsis containing chronology of events as filed at the time of presentation of petition for seeking special leave to appeal (SLP)/Appeal, as statement of case, and does not desire to file any further statement of case. If the Respondent has not filed statement of case within the stipulated time as provided in Sub Rule-1 of S.C.R. 2013, it is presumed that the respondent does not desire to lodge statement of case in the appeal.
- (g) Not applicable.
Dated this the 23rd day of August, 2016.
Copy to:-
-
- Mr. D.S. Mahra Advocate. 114, Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court Compund, New Delhi
-
- Mr. Amlan Kumar Ghosh, Advocate. 20, Lawyers Chamber, SCI, New Delhi
Rm/c4/Roni/2015
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search
Same Parties
Comptroller And Auditor General Of India Union Of India vs Om PrakashComptroller And Auditor General Of India Union Of IndiaPrincipal Accountant General (A And E) ISenior Accounts Officer/Admn. 2 Office Of P. A. G. (A And E) IPrincipal Accountant General (G And Ssa) The State Of Madhya PradeshSenior Audit Officer/Admn. 12 Office Of Principal Accountant General (General And Social Sector Audit) The State Of Madhya PradeshOm PrakashHarish Chandra PalMadho SinghBal KishanVichar Singh YadavJeewan LalHarcharan SinghRaj Veer SinghRam KumarSubhash Kumar JhaDilawar KhanRitesh Kumar SavitaMahesh KumarSatish Kumar SharmaGhanshyamMahesh SahuSantosh DharmadikariBraj Mohan UpmanyuMadan GopalBablooGulab Singh KushwahDal ChandSabir KhanRajjan
Judges
Search in District Courts Data
Comptroller And Auditor General Of India Union Of IndiaPrincipal Accountant General (A And E) ISenior Accounts Officer/Admn. 2 Office Of P. A. G. (A And E) IPrincipal Accountant General (G And Ssa) The State Of Madhya PradeshSenior Audit Officer/Admn. 12 Office Of Principal Accountant General (General And Social Sector Audit) The State Of Madhya PradeshOm PrakashHarish Chandra PalMadho SinghBal KishanVichar Singh YadavJeewan LalHarcharan SinghRaj Veer SinghRam KumarSubhash Kumar JhaDilawar KhanRitesh Kumar SavitaMahesh KumarSatish Kumar SharmaGhanshyamMahesh SahuSantosh DharmadikariBraj Mohan UpmanyuMadan GopalBablooGulab Singh KushwahDal ChandSabir KhanRajjanAdvocate Anil KatiyarAdvocate Pashupathi Nath RazdanAdvocate Amlan Kumar Ghosh