Bhushan Chimanlal Jain vs. The City And Industrial Development Corporation Of Maharashtra Limited (Cidco Limited)

ITEM NO.5 Court 5 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.4589-4591/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-01-2021 in FA No.300/2013 20-01-2021 in FA No.301/2013 20-01-2021 in FA No.302/2013 passed by the National Consumers Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi)

BHUSHAN CHIMANLAL JAIN Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT Respondent(s) CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA LIMITED (CIDCO LIMITED) & ORS.

(With appln.(s) for I.R. and IA No.39957/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)

Date : 24-03-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.R. SHAH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddhant Buxy, AOR Ms. Priyanka Vora, Adv. Ms. Shriya Chanda, Adv.

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1 We have heard Mr Siddhant Buxy, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

• 2 Having perused the record we see no error in the order of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 20 January 2021 in First Appeal Nos 300-302 of 2013. Mr Buxy however submits that the time of eight weeks which has been granted by the NCDRC to deposit the balance consideration together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum has expired and an extension of time may hence be granted. In order to facilitate compliance with the order of the NCDRC, we extend time for payment of the balance consideration inclusive of interest by a further period of eight weeks from today.
• 3 The Special Leave Petitions are, subject to the above extension, accordingly dismissed.
• 4 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(CHETAN KUMAR) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) A.R.-cum-P.S. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR