Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (Mmrda) vs. Raghuleela Builders Private Limited
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Ajay Rastogi, Hon'ble Aniruddha Bose
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
27 Jul 2020
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6 Court 7 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IX
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 6411/2020
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 20-11-2019 in WP No. 586/2018 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay)
MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (MMRDA) & ORS. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
M/S RAGHULEELA BUILDERS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.45763/2020-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.45765/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE LENGTHY LIST OF DATES and IA No.45766/2020-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date : 27-07-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIRUDDHA BOSE
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. K.K. Venugopal, AG<br>Ms. Madhavi Divan, ASG<br>Mr. Nivit Srivastava, Adv.<br>Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Adv.<br>Ms. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv.<br>Mr. Pramod B. Agarwala, AOR |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Harish Salve, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Milind Sathe, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. K. R. Sasiprabhu, AOR<br>Mr. Ashwin Dave, Adv.<br>Mr. Amey Nabar, Adv.<br>Mr. Raghav Shankar, Adv.<br>Mr. Vishnu Sharma, Adv. |
| Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Ashish Batra, AOR |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We have heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
We are not inclined to exercise our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India in the given facts of the case and more so as reflected from paragraphs 38 and 40 of the impugned judgment.
Mr.K.K.Venugopal, learned Attorney General for India expresses some apprehension on account of there being other matters pending.
We clarify that the present matter is in the given facts of the case as stated aforesaid and thus, cannot be said to influence any other matter in this behalf.
The special leave petition is dismissed in terms aforesaid. Pending applications shall also stand disposed of.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (ANITA RANI AHUJA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR