Sankappa Shetty (Since Deceased) Through Legal Heirs vs. Sarita Sadananda Vente @ Savita Sadananda Vente
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Mention Memo
Before:
Hon'ble Indira Banerjee, Hon'ble J.K. Maheshwari
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
16 Mar 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.6 Court 8 (Video Conferencing) SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ . 3952/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 08-02-2022 in CA No. 1276/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Goa)
SANKAPPA SHETTY (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS & ANR.
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SARITA SADANANDA VENTE @ SAVITA SADANANDA VENTE & ORS.
Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.32198/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES )
Date: 16-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Surendra Desai, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sangramsingh R. Bhonsle, Adv. Ms. Samridhi S. Jain, Adv. Ms. Pushkara A. Bhonsle, Adv. Mr. Satyam Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Vincent Dsouza, Adv. Ms. Shalaka Shelke, Adv. Mr. Tejas Rane, Adv. Ms. Sanjida Saiyad, Adv. Mr. Aman Varma, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D F R
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.
Interfered We find no grounds to interfere with the impugned judgment and 🖏 der of the High Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of accordingly.
(GULSHAN KUMAR ARORA) (MATHEW ABRAHAM) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)