The State Of Madhya Pradesh Superintendent vs. Pappu

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR M K HANJURA Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 3627-3628/2013 PANKAJ & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS PAPPU & ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for exemption from filing o.t. and office report) WITH SLP(Crl) No. 3107/2014 (With appln.(s) for exemption from filing o.t. and Office Report) Date : 14/08/2014 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms.Veena Rattan,adv. Ms. Pratibha Jain ,Adv. Mr.Anil Kr.Pandey,adv. Mr. C. D. Singh ,Adv. For Respondent(s) Dr. (mrs. ) Vipin Gupta ,Adv. Mr. Aftab Ali Khan ,Adv. Mr.Anil Kr.Pandey,adv. Mr. C. D. Singh ,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP(Cr)No.3627-28/2013 Ld.counsel for the respondent No.90 seeks and is given four weeks time as last chance to file the counter affidavit. Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No.69. Signature Not Verified Digitally signed by Sushma Kumari Bajaj Date: 2014.08.19 13:56:49 IST Reason: .....2 ITEM NO.30 -2- SLP(Cr)No.3107/2014

Fresh steps for the service of notice to the unserved respondent Nos.1,16, 19, 52, 54, 69, 72 & 78 shall be taken by the

Æ ITEM NO.30 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IIA

Ld.counsel for the petitioner within a period of three weeks. List again on 31.10.2014.

(M K HANJURA) Registrar

SB