Sri Srikanta D N Wadiyar (D) By Lr vs. The State Of Karnataka State Of Karnataka Through Its Chie Secretary

º ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.11 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS I.A. N. 15-16 AND 17-18 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 3309-3310 OF 1997 INDRAKASHI DEVI & ORS. Appellant (s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA Respondent(s) (for directions,exemption from filing O.T. and office report ) With I.A. NO. 3-4 in C.A. NO. 3306 OF 1997 (For directions and exemption from filing O.T. and office report) I.A. No.13 in C.A. No. 3303 of 1997 (For directions and office report) Date: 15/04/2013 These Appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE Appearing for the parties : I.A.No.13 in Mr. V. Krishnamurthy, Sr.Adv. CA 3309-10/97 Mr. T. Harish Kumar, adv. Mr. V. Vasudevan, Adv. Mr. Aditya Sondhi, Adv. Mrs. Kanchan Kaur Dhodi, adv. Mr. Karan Joseph, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr.Adv. Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev K. Bhardwaj, Adv. Mrs. Lalita Kaushik, Adv. Mr. Pramod Dayal, Adv.

Mr. V. Ramasubramanian, Adv.

State of Karnataka Mr. Basavaprabhu S. Patil, Sr.Adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv. Mr. S. Prasad, Adv. Mr. Manu Nair, Adv. For M/s Suresh A. Shroff and Co. Mr. Kailash Vasdev, Sr.Adv. Mr. Yudhister Singh, Adv. Mr. S.N. Bhat, Adv. Mr. Sanjay R. Hegde, adv. Ms. Meera Mathur, Adv. Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Vikas Mehta, Adv. Mr. N. Ganpathy, Adv. Mr. V.N. Raghupathy, Adv. Mr. N.D.B. Raju, Adv. Ms. Bharathy Raju, Adv. Mr. Guntur Prabhakar, Adv. Ms. Shirin Khajuria, Adv. Mr. R.P. Wadhwani, Adv. Mr. S. Udaya Kumar Sagar, Adv. Mr. Shivaji M. Jadhav, Adv. Mrs. Prabha Swami, Adv. Mr. K. Swami, Adv. UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

 O R D E R

It is brought to our notice that although number of appeals have been filed against the common judgment, I.A. No.13 has been filed only in Civil appeal No. 3303 of 1997. A large number of appellants represented through their individual advocates have voiced the concern that the aforesaid I.A., which will bind everybody, would be decided without having their view point on record. In order to avoid any further delay,

...2/-

-2 we direct the applicant to make available copies of the I.A. No.13 to all the learned counsel for different appellants. The appellants are at liberty to file reply to the aforesaid I.A. setting out their view point, if so advised. Let the reply be filed within a period of two weeks.

List in the first week of May, 2013. Let all the appeals be listed on that day.

(Sukhbir Paul Kaur) (Indu Bala Kapur)

Court Master Court Master