Salma vs. The State Of Uttar Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble S. Ravindra Bhat, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar
Stage:
BAIL MATTERS
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
28 Aug 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Interlocutory Applications:
86335/2023,86336/2023,
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.3
COURT NO.5
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9104/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2023 in CRMBA No. 52558/2022 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad)
SALMA
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH
Respondent(s)
IA No. 86336/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 86335/2023 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)
Date: 28-08-2023 These matters were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Bibek Tripathi, Adv.<br>Mr. Arun Singh, Adv.<br>Ms. Surabhi Shukla, Adv.<br>Mr. Saurabh Chaudhary, Adv.<br>Mr. Noor Alam, Adv.<br>Mr. P. Soma Sundaram, AOR |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Adv.<br>Ms. Pareena Swarup, Adv.<br>Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv.<br>Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR |
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard counsel for the parties.
V<sup>erified</sup> This Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned and order of the High Court.
$\mathbf{1}$
The special leave petition is dismissed.
It is, however, open to the petitioner to seek bail afresh in the light of the documents produced by the important witnesses for the prosecution.
(HARSHITA UPPAL) (BEENA JOLLY) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT COURT MASTER (NSH)