S. Sekar vs. R. Shanmugam
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
VERSUS R. SHANMUGAM & ORS. Respondent(s) IA No. 32180/2024 - SUBSTITUTED SERVICE) Date : 03-05-2024 These matters were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Ms. Divya Swami, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Swami, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Apoorva Singhal , AOR M/S. Ksn & Co., AOR Mr. Siddharth Naidu, Adv. Mr. V Balachandran, Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11167- 11169/2023 S. SEKAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. PRADIP Y. LADEKAR
O R D E R
Despite due service on respondent nos.14, 17 and 18, there is no appearance.
Respondent Nos.21 to 28 have been deleted from array of parties.
Application for substituted service has been filed in respect of respondent nos.19 and 20 but same is still defective.
Pradip Yeshwantrao Ladekar
Digitally signed by Pradip Yeshwantrao Ladekar Date: 2024.05.03 17:27:54 +0530
ITEM NO.28 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION XII
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
However, Ld. Counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent nos.19 and 20 have also passed away. He further submits that he is not aware of the Lrs. of deceased respondent nos.1, 6 to 10, 19 and 20 and he may file application for deleting them from the array of parties. Two weeks time, as a last chance is granted to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in this regard.
Respondent nos.2 to 5, 11 to 13, 15 and 16 have failed to file counter affidavit, within the time stipulated under the rules.
List again on 06.08.2024.
PRADIP Y. LADEKAR Registrar