Vijaya Raghava Reddy vs. State Of Karnataka

Item No.10 1 REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IVA S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE REGISTRAR MR.RAJESH KUMAR GOEL Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).35608-35620/2013 SHANKAR LAMANI & ORS Petitioner(s) VERSUS STATE OF KARNATAKA & ORS Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for modification of court's order and substituted service and interim relief and office report) WITH SLP(C) No. 36714-36736/2013 (With (With (With (With appln.(s) for substituted service and appln.(s) for may refer to remarks and appln.(s) for modification of court's order and appln.(s) for transposing respondents as petitioners and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 18319-18328/2014 (With appln.(s) for substituted service and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 30546/2015 (With (With (With appln.(s) for c/delay in refiling SLP and appln. (s) for substituted service and appln.(s) for c/delay in filing SLP and Office Report) Date : 14/02/2017 These petitions were called on for hearing today. For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shailesh Madiyal,Adv. Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra,Adv. Ms. Shruti Srivastav,Adv. Mr. Deepak Prakash,Adv. Mr. P. Srinivasan,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. For Respondent(s) Ms. Shruti Srivastav,Adv. Mr. Deepak Prakash,Adv. Item No.10 2 Mr. Rajesh Mahale,Adv. Mr. Rakesh K. Sharma,Adv. Mr. S. N. Bhat,Adv. Mr. V. N. Raghupathy,Adv. Ms. K. V. Bharathi Upadhyaya,Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal,Adv. Mr. K.K. Mani,Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar,Adv. Mr. Apoorv Kurup,Adv. Mr. Avanish Rathi,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Four weeks time is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners for filing the proof of paper publication in respect of Respondent No. 7,38,48,49,51,89 in SLP(C) Nos. 35608-35620/2013. Respondent Nos.9,22,29-31,35,37-40,74,76,77,83,84,87,101, 110,114, 134,137,138,140,148,149,151,153-157,159 in SLP(C) Nos. 36714-36736/2013, Respondent Nos. 32,38 and 78 in SLP(C) Nos. 18319-18328/2014 and Respondent Nos. 8 and 31 in SLP(C) No. 30546/2015. The office report indicates that the vakalatnama filed Mr. N.R. Vani, Ld. Counsel in SLP(C) Nos. 35608-35620/2013 is defective. The learned counsel shall within a period of four weeks cure the defects whatever have been found in the said vakalatnama. Four weeks time is given to the learned counsel for the petitioners to comply with the terms of Office Report dated 13.2.2017 in respect of Respondent Nos. 3,5,52 and 89 in SLP(C) Nos. 36714-36736/2013 . List again on 30.3.2017 .

(Rajesh Kumar Goel)

Registrar