Ramesh Since Deceased Through His Lrs vs. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation

ITEM NO.27 1

REGISTRAR COURT. 2 SECTION IX

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. RAJIV KALRA

IA 120320/2018, in Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 23250/2018

RAMRAO SHANKAR TAPASE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION & ORS.Respondent(s)

IA No. 120320/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.)

WITH SLP(C) No. 26249/2018 (IX)

SLP(C) No. 27140-27141/2018 (IX) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.108541/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE SLP/TP)

SLP(C) No. 24890-24891/2018 (IX) ([ TO BE TAKEN UP ALONG WITH ITEM NO.37 I.E. D. NO.31244/2018 ])

SLP(C) No. 27888-27889/2018 (IX)

SLP(C) No. 24909-24910/2018 (IX) ( FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 123781/2018 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 123782/2018 IA No. 123781/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT IA No. 123782/2018 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) SLP(C) No. 26245-26246/2018 (IX)

SLP(C) No. 1793/2019 (IX)

Diary No(s). 36320/2019 (IX)

(IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 165462/2019 FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT ON IA 165463/2019 IA No. 165462/2019 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 165463/2019 - EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT) Digitally signed by MADHU GROVER Date: 2019.12.14 11:50:32 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

For Petitioner(s) Mr. K. Krishna Kumar, AOR Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR Mr. Kush Chaturvedi, AOR Mr. Rajat Joseph, AOR Ms. Anagha S. Desai, AOR For Respondent(s)

Mr. Soumik Ghosal, AOR Mr. Navdeep Vora, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) Nos. 23250,26249,27140-27141,24890-24891,27888-27889,24909- 24910/2018 and SLP(C) No. 26245-26246/2018

Being complete matters, place the same before the Hon'ble Court, as per rules.

SLP(C) No. 1793/2019

Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.4 and 5 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

Service is not complete in respect of respondent No.2.

However, Mr.Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Ld. Advocate-on-Record seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2.

Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to respondent Nos. 1 and 3 shall be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner within a period of two weeks.

Diary No. 36320/2019

Four weeks' time is given to learned counsel for respondent No.1 to file counter affidavit.

Service of notice is complete on the respondent Nos.2 and 3 but no one has entered appearance on their behalf.

However, Mr.Seshatalpa Sai Bandaru, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Nishant R. Katneshwarkar, Ld. Advocate-on-Record seeks and is given one week's time to file the vakalatnama and four weeks' time to file the counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No.2.

List again on 20.2.2020.

RAJIV KALRA Registrar

MG