The State Of Karnataka Through Its Chief Secretary vs. The Forward Foundation

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal Diary No(s). 17976/2016 CORE MIND SOFTWARE AND SERVICES PVT. LTD. Appellant(s) $A$ VERSUS FORWARD FOUNDATION AND ORS. Respondent(s) (with appln. (s) for condonation of delay in filing appeal. and office report) Date : 08/08/2016 This appeal was called on for hearing today. $CORAM :$ HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD Mr. Raju Ramachandran, Sr. Adv. For Appellant(s) Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Adv. Mr. Vaibhav Niti, Adv. Ms. Mythili Vijay Kumar Thallam, Adv. Mr. Vikram Aditya Narayan, Adv. Mr. Harish N.Salve, Sr. Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mahesh Agaarwal, adv. Mr. Rishabh Parikh, Adv. Mr. Priyasarshi Banerjee, adv. Mr. Saransh Jain, Adv. Mr. Praveen Sehrawat, Adv. Mr. Naresh Kumar, Adv. Mr. E.C.Agrawala, Adv. Mr. Shekhar G.Devasa, Adv. Mr. Manish Tiwari, Adv. Mr. Anup Kumar, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Mahale, Adv. MR. Shivender Dwivedi, Adv. Mr. O. P. Bhadani, Adv.

$\mathbf{1}$

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

SECTION XVII

COURT NO.1

ITEM NO.20

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Delay condoned.

Appeal admitted.

Recovery of the amount of compensation awarded against the appellant shall remain stayed subject to the following conditions:

1) The appellant shall not carry out any construction activity in the land in dispute.

2) The demolition orders, if any, passed by any authority shall not be affected by the pendency of these proceedings. The appellant shall however be free, if so advised, to seek appropriate redress in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

Tag with Civil Appeal No. 5016 of 2016.

(Shashi Sareen) (Veena Khera) AR-cum-PS Court Master