Adani Ports And Special Economic Zone Ltd vs. Gajuba (Gajendrasinh) Bhimaji Jadeja

ITEM NO.7 REGISTRAR COURT. 1 SECTION III

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

BEFORE THE REGISTRAR SH. ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 1799/2014

OIL FIELD WAREHOUSE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

GAJUBHA (GAJENDRASINHA) BHIMJI JADEJA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) No. 1680/2015 (III)

Date : 13-02-2020 This petition was called on for hearing today.

For Petitioner(s) Mr Paban K Sharma, Adv. Mr Anchit Sripat, Adv.

Mr. Himanshu Shekhar, AOR Ms Prerana Amitabh, Adv. Mr. Ashok Mathur, AOR

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Kamini Jaiswal, AOR Mr. Praveen Kumar, AOR

• Mr. Anil Kumar Mishra-i, AOR
• Ms. Hemantika Wahi, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

SLP(C) No. 1799/2014

None appeared for the respondent nos. 1 and 12(caveator) when called. The record shows that counter affidavit has not been filed till today. There is neither written application for Digitally signed by Anil Laxman Pansare Date: 2020.02.14 11:18:48 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Item no.7

extension of time to file pleadings in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules, 2013 nor is there oral request to that effect. It appears that respondents are not interested in filing counter affidavit and, therefore, opportunity to file counter affidavit stands declined.

Service is complete on respondent no.14 but none has entered appearance.

None appeared for respondent no.5 when called. Record shows that notice has been accepted before the Hon'ble Court on 27.1.2014, however, counter affidavit has not been filed. There is neither written application for extension of time to file pleadings in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules, 2013 nor is there oral request to that effect. It appears that respondent is not interested in filing counter affidavit and, therefore, opportunity to file counter affidavit stands declined.

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos.2 to 4, 6 to 11, 13 and 15 to 24 within two weeks time.

Application for directions be processed as per rules.

SLP(C) No. 1680/2015

Ld. Counsel for the petitioner to take fresh steps to effect service on respondent nos.1 to 7, 9 to 14 & 17 within two weeks time.

-2-

Item no.7

None appeared for respondent nos. 8,15 and 16 when called. The record shows that vakalatnama on behalf of respondent nos. 8 and 15 has been filed on 12.3.2015 and respondent no.16 is caveator however, counter affidavit has not been filed till today. There is neither written application for extension of time to file pleadings in terms of Order V Rule 1(22), Supreme Court Rules, 2013 nor is there oral request to that effect. It appears that the respondents are not interested in filing counter affidavit and, therefore, opportunity to file counter affidavit stands declined.

List again on 21.4.2020.

ANIL LAXMAN PANSARE Registrar