Federation Haj Ptos Of India vs. Union Of India

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Abhay S. Oka
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:27 Feb 2023
CNR:SCIN010062132023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

27 Feb 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.19+59 COURT NO.17 SECTION X

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Writ Petition(s)(Civil) No(s). 196/2023

FEDERATION HAJ PTOS OF INDIA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION )

ITEM NO.59

W.P.(C) No. 231/2023 (FOR ADMISSION)

WITH W.P.(C) No.266/2023 (X)

W.P.(C) No.257/2023 (X) (FOR ADMISSION)

W.P.(C) No. 275/2023 (X) (FOR ADMISSION)

Date : 27-02-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY S. OKA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dushyant Dave, Sr. Adv. Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Adv. Mrs. Taiba Khan, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Ainul Ansari, Adv. Ms. Nida Khan, Adv. Mr. Ashish Choudhury, Adv. Mr. Imran Ali Khan, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Adv. Mr. Akash Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Gopeshwar Singh Chandel, Adv. Mr. Rohit Amit Sthalekar, AOR Mr. Suleman Mohd Khan, Adv. Mr. Ainul Ansari, Adv. Ms. Taiba Khan, Adv. Signature Not Verified

Mr. Manoj Kumar Goyal, Adv.

Ms. Priyanka Goyal, Adv.

Ms. Ritu Rajkumari, Adv. Mr. Rajat Bhardwaj, AOR Mr. Kripa Shankar Prasad, AOR Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Adv. Mrs. Taiba Khan, Adv. Mr. Mohd. Ainul Ansari, Adv. Ms. Nida Khan, Adv. Mr. Ashish Choudhury, Adv. Mr. Imran Ali Khan, Adv. Mr. Bhanu Malhotra, Adv. Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Adv. Mr. Akash Bhushan, Adv. Mr. Gopeshwar Singh Chandel, Adv. Mr. Rohit Amit Sthalekar, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. Tushar Mehta, Solicitor General Mr. K.M. Nataraj, A.S.G. Mr. Rajat Nair, Adv. Mr. Shailesh Madiyal, Adv. Mr. Navanjay Mahapatra, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

In normal course, this Court would not have entertained the petitions filed under Article 32 of the Constitution as the petitioners could have approached the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. However, to avoid the possibiity of the petitioners filing writ petitions in different High Courts, at this stage, we are entertaining these petitions.

Learned ASG prays for a time of four weeks to file counter affidavit. Accordingly, time is granted.

List on 10.04.2023.

(INDU MARWAH) (R.S. NARAYANAN) COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)

2

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(2) - 10 Apr 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Click to view

Order(1) - 27 Feb 2023

ROP - of Main Case

Viewing