Sujit Nath vs. The State Of Tripura

$\mathbf{1}$

ITEM NO.306

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).24512/2023

[Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-12-2022 in WA No. 31/2021 passed by the High Court of Tripura at Agarthala]

SRI SAIKAT SAHA

VERSUS

THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS.

$RESPONDENT(S)$

WITH Diarv No(s). 6176/2024 (XIV)

$\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 59192/2024 FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 4240/2025 IA No. 4240/2025 - CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION IA No. 59192/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Diary No(s). 6178/2024 (XIV) $\mathbf{I}\mathbf{A}$ FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 63369/2024 IA No. 63369/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Diary No(s). 6172/2024 (XIV) IA No.57328/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING IA No. 57328/2024 - CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING

Date: 24-03-2025 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA

For Petitioner(s) : ture Not Verified

Mr. Manoj, Adv. Mr. Manaoj, Adv. Ms. Aparna Sinha, AOR

For Respondent(s) :

PETITIONER(S)

Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, A.S.G. Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv. Mr. P. N. Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Narendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. A. K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Arun Kumar Yadav, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty, Adv. Mrs. Ranjana Pathak, Adv. Mr. Somik Deb, Sr. Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey, AOR Mr. Subramaniam S., Adv. Mr. Subramanaim S., Adv. Mr. Ashish Kumar Pandey, Adv. Mr. Arun, Adv.

Mr. Sriram P., AOR

Upon hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1. It is submitted that Ms. Aishwarya Bhati, learned Additional Solicitor General, who has been engaged by the State to argue the matter, is held up in another Court, and as such, an adjournment is prayed for.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, as per the information received under the Right to Information Act, 2005, at least 56 posts of Panchayat Executive Officer, redesignated from the post of Panchayat Secretary/Rural Programme Manager (RPM), are still lying vacant.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Additional Solicitor General seeks time to obtain instructions as to whether the present petitioners, who are not more than four (4) in number, can be accommodated and, if so, on what terms.

2

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners would not claim seniority or back wages, should the State favourably consider their appointment.

5. List on 07.04.2025 at 2 p.m.

(D. NAVEEN) (ANU BHALLA)

COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)