Sujit Nath vs. The State Of Tripura

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 24512/2023 [Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 14-12-2022 in WA No. 31/2021 passed by the High Court of Tripura at Agarthala] SRI SAIKAT SAHA Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF TRIPURA & ORS. Respondent $(s)$ WITH Diary No(s). 6176/2024 (XIV) (IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 59192/2024 AND FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION ON IA 4240/2025) Diary No(s). 6178/2024 (XIV) (IA FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING ON IA 63369/2024) Diary No(s). 6172/2024 (XIV) (IA No.57328/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING) Date: 11-02-2025 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KAROL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA For Petitioner(s): Mr. Manoj, Adv. Ms. Aparna Sinha, AOR For Respondent(s): Mr. Shuvodeep Roy, AOR Mr. Deepayan Dutta, Adv. Mr. Saurabh Tripathi, Adv. Mr. Narendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Jitendra Mohapatra, Adv. Mr. A. K. Yadav, Adv. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, AOR Mr. Arun Yadav, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty, Adv. Mrs. Ranjana Pathak, Adv. Mr. Mayank Pandey, AOR

COURT NO.16

SECTION XIV

ITEM NO.36

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

1 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would not assail the appointment of the private respondents as also not claim seniority and back wages should the respondent-State favourably considered their selection process pursuant to the advertisement dated 05th October, 2015.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent-State to obtain appropriate instructions.

3. List the matter as part-heard on 17.02.2025.

(RAJNI MUKHI) (ANU BHALLA) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)