Rajkumar Upadhyay vs. Baroda Rayon Corporation Limited

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 6107/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 11-01-2021 in LPA No. 948/2015 passed by the High Court Of Gujarat At Ahmedabad)

GIRISHBHAI ISHVARBHAI PATEL & ORS. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

BARODA RAYON CORPORATION LIMITED & ORS. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.43323/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.43325/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.43331/2021-INTERVENTION/IMPLEADMENT and IA No.43322/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

WITH

Diary No(s). 6354/2021 (III) (FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.39778/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.39777/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

Date : 15-06-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN (VACATION BENCH)

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Samir Malik, AOR Mr. Aman Malik, Adv. Mr. Chandra Prakash, AOR

For Respondent(s)	Mr. J. P. Cama, Sr. Adv.
	Mr. Salin Mehta, Sr. Adv.
	Mr. Hamesh C. Naidu, Adv.
	Mr. Vivek Shah, Adv.
	Mr. Navin Prakash, AOR
	Mr. C. U. Singh, Sr. Adv.
	Mr. Prashant Choudhari, Adv.
	Mr. Priank Adhyaru, Adv.

Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R SLP (C) D. No. 6107/2021

Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.

The argument of the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners is that the order of the learned Single Judge has been substituted by the order in appeal though the settlement was only in respect of 1886 employees.

Issue notice on the Special Leave Petition as well as on the application for intervention/impleadment, returnable in six weeks.

Mr. Navin Prakash, learned AOR, accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 1 and Mr. R. P. Goyal, learned AOR, accepts notice on behalf of Respondent No. 2. Notice may be served on the other respondents.

Counter affidavit be filed within three weeks from today.

Diary No(s). 6354/2021

Permission to file Special Leave Petition is granted.

The learned counsel for the petitioner claims to have interest in the purchase of the property of the company in question. The fact that at one point of time, by virtue of an interim order, the petitioner has deposited some amount, does not create any legally enforceable right in the petitioner. We do not find any merit in the present Special Leave Petition. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, is/are disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (NISHA TRIPATHI) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER

2