Haryana Shehri Vikas Pradhikaran Earlier Known As Haryana Urban Development Authority vs. Sapna Khanna
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
FRESH
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice, Hon'ble Surya Kant, Hon'ble A.S. Bopanna
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Dismissed
Listed On:
20 Jul 2022
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.3
COURT NO.4
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).5274/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02-12-2021 in CR No. 2885/2021 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh)
HARYANA SHEHRI VIKAS PRADHIKARAN EARLIER KNOWN AS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
SAPNA KHANNA & ORS.
Respondent $(s)$
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.44113/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING <pre>C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT)</pre>
Date: 20-07-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
- HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
- For Petitioner(s) Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. AAG Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma, Adv. Mr. Anurag Kulharia, Adv. Dr. Monika Gusain, AOR
- For Respondent(s) Mr. Jai Anant Dehadrai, Adv. Mr. Sidharth Arora, Adv. Mr. Jaskaran Singh Chawla, Adv. Mr. Rohit Anil Rathi, AOR
Mr. Kaushik Poddar, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0 R D E R$
- $\mathbf{1}$ In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case, no case for interference under Article 136 of the Constitution is made out.
- $\mathcal{L}$ The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed.
Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(SANJAY KUMAR-I) DEPUTY REGISTRAR (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) COURT MASTER