Milind Shantilal Rathod vs. The State Of Maharashtra
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.39
COURT NO.9
SECTION IX
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) $No(s)$ .3674/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 30-01-2023 in WP No.8568/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay)
VERSUS
MILIND SHANTILAL RATHOD & ORS.
Petitioner(s)
Respondent $(s)$
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.36025/2023-ADDITION/DELETION/ MODIFICATION PARTIES and IA No.36023/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.36024/2023-EXEMPTION FROM FILING No.36722/2023-PERMISSION $\mathsf{T}\mathsf{O}$ FTIF ADDTTTONAL $0.T.$ $\quad\text{and}\quad$ $TA$ DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date: 08-05-2023 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA KANT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI
| For Petitioner(s) Mr. Siddharth S. Chapalgaonkar, Adv.<br>Mr. Sangharsh Waghmare, Adv.<br>Mr. Pai Amit, AOR<br>Ms. Sneha Botwe, Adv.<br>Mr. Abhiyudaya Vats, Adv. | |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. Ram S.Apte, Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv.<br>Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR<br>Mr. Bharat Bagla, Adv. |
- Ms. Shreva Saxena, Adv.
- Ms. Yamini Singh, Adv.
- Mr. Sourav Singh, Adv.
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following $0$ R D E R
$\mathbf{1}$ Counter affidavit has not been filed by the respondents despite opportunity being granted.
In the interest of justice, four weeks' time is granted $\overline{\mathbf{\tilde{t}}}$ o the respondents to file the counter affidavit.
3. Rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within two weeks from the date of receipt of the counter affidavit.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (PREETHI T.C.) DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)