The Principal Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. Schevaran Laboratory Pvt. Ltd
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NOS. 32127 OF 2015, 392, 395, 389, 1232, 67356740 & 9473 OF 2016 WITH PRAYER FOR INTERIM RELIEF
Union of India & Anr. …..Petitioners
Versus
M/s. Malladi Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd. ….Respondents
OFFICE REPORT
The Office Report was listed before the Ld. Registrar's Court on 22nd
September, 2016 when the following orders were passed:
"SLP(C) Nos. 7559,10126,11772,11145,11769,12787 and 14547/2016
Being complete matters. Place these matters before the Hon'ble Court.
SLP(C) No. 11156/2016
The Ld. Counsel for the sole respondent has failed to file the counter affidavit within the period stipulated under the rules. Viewed, in that context, the matter shall be processed for listing before the Hon'ble Court, under the rules.
SLP(C) No. 392/2016
As per tracking report notice could not be served upon the sole respondent as he has "Left without instructions", Therefore, the learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the sole respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
SLP(C) No. 389/2016
As per tracking report notice could not be served, the same has been received back "without any remarks". Hence, learned counsel for the petitioner shall within a period of four weeks file the fresh particulars of the sole respondent and he shall also take fresh steps for the service of notice to him within the same period.
SLP(C) Nos. 395/2016
Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the respondent No. 2.
SLP(C) No. 1232/2016
Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 10.8.2016 of this Court.
SLP(C) No. 9473/2016
Service of notice is complete on the respondent No.1 but no one has entered appearance on his behalf. Four weeks time, as last chance is given to the learned counsel for the petitioner to comply with the terms of the order dated 10.8.2016 of this Court in respect of Respondent No.2.
SLP(C) Nos. 67356740/2016
Await the return of the service of notice already issued to the sole respondent.
SLP(C) No. 32127/2015
Fresh steps for the service of notice by usual mode to the sole respondent shall be taken by the learned counsel for thepetitioners within a period of four weeks. List again on 8.11.2016."
SLP (Civil) No. 32127 of 2015
It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has not filed a copy of SLP for issue of fresh show cause notice to the sole respondent so far.
SLP (Civil) No. 392 of 2016
It is submitted that Counsel for the Petitioner has on 07th October, 2016 filed affidavit of fresh address furnishing therein Chairman's and Managing Director's address but the counsel has not filed copies of SLP for issue of fresh show cause notice on both the addresses in respect of sole respondent so far.
SLP (Civil) No. 395 of 2016
It is submitted that track report shows that the show cause notice has not been delivered in the address of respondent no. 2 so far. Service of notice is incomplete.
SLP (Civil) No. 389 of 2016
It is submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has on 03rd October, 2016 filed a letter stating therein that he may be issued dasti notice to serve the
notice to the unserved sole respondent. Accordingly, dasti notice was issued on 8 th October, 2016 to the counsel for the petitioner with a request to file affidavit of dasti service along with proof of service but the counsel for the petitioner has not filed the same so far.
SLP (Civil) No. 1232 of 2016
It is submitted that the counsel for the petitioner has not filed an application for amendment of cause title alongwith certificate of incorporation so far.
SLP (Civil) No. 67356740 of 2016
It is submitted that neither A.D. cards nor unserved covers containing the notice (issued to common sole respondent at four addresses furnished by the counsel for the petitioner) has been received back so far.
SLP (Civil) No. 9473 of 2016
It is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed has been received back from Respondent No. 2 but no one has filed Vakalatnama/ Appearance on behalf of the said respondent no. 2 so far. Service of notice is complete.
The Office Report is listed before the Ld. Registrar Court.
Dated this the 07th day of November 2016
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
Copy to:
-
- Mr. B.K. Prasad, Advocate, Central Agency Section,
-
- Ms. Uttara Babbar, Advocate, 112, C.K. Daphtary Block Lawyers Chambers,
-
- Mr. E.C. Agrawala, Advocate 48, Old Lawyers Chambers.
-
- Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, Advocate
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
c4