Education Promotion Society For India&Or vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
23 Feb 2011
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
| ITEM NO.2 | COURT NO.3 | SECTION X |
|---|---|---|
| S U P R E M E | C O U R T<br>O F<br>RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS<br>WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 89 OF 2011 | I N D I A |
| JAIPURIA INST.OF MGT.& ORS. | Petitioner(s) | |
| VERSUS | ||
| ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDU.&ORS | Respondent(s) | |
| (With appln(s) for interim Relief<br>WITH W.P(C) NO. 90 of 2011<br>(With appln.(s) for stay and office report)<br>W.P(C) NO. 92 of 2011<br>(With appln.(s) for stay and office report) | ||
| Date: 15/03/2011<br>today. | These Petitions were called on for hearing | |
| CORAM :<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.V. RAVEENDRAN<br>HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATNAIK | ||
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Sunil Gupta,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Vinay Garg,Adv.<br>Mrs. Deepam Garg,Adv.<br>Ms. Jyoti Sharma,Adv. | |
| Mr.<br>K.K. Venugopal,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Mukul Rohtagi,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>C.V. Francis,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Gopal Sankaranaraynan,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Ramesh Babu M.R.,Adv. | ||
| Dr. Rajiv Dhawan,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr. Naresh Kaushik,Adv.<br>Mrs Lalita Kaushik,Adv. | ||
| For Respondent(s)<br>(For AICTE) | Mr.<br>Rakesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Rusu Rama Chandran,Sr.Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Amitesh Kumar,Adv.<br>Mr.<br>Navin Prakash,Adv. | |
| (For UOI) | Mr. R.K. Rathore,Adv.<br>Mr. H.S. Sachdeva,Adv. | |
| UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following<br>O R D E R<br>2 | ||
| Mr.<br>Navin | Prakash, | learned<br>counsel |
| appearing<br>for | AICTE<br>seeks<br>two | days<br>time<br>to |
| enter<br>appearance | for<br>the<br>first | respondent<br>- |
| AICTE. | ||
| Learned | counsel<br>for | the<br>petitioners |
| submits that there is an urgency in regard to |
the interim prayers. The following four issues
are identified for urgent consideration, such
as:
(1) Admissions for the current year: That is, whether they should be on the existing model on the basis of National level entrance tests - (CAT, MAT, XAT, ATMA, JMET) or through the State level entrance examinations.
(2) Fee fixation: whether fee should be fixed by the Fee Fixation Committees at State Level, or by National Level Fee Fixation Committee or whether there should be mere monitoring of the fees charged by the Colleges to ensure that there is no exploitation or charging of capitation fee.
(3) Composition of Board of Governors: whether Appendix XIX of Process Hand Book requiring the Board of Governors to include 5 3 nominees of the AICTE and State Government is valid.
(4) Part-time Courses: Whether the prohibition or abolition of part-time PGDM/MBA courses is justified.
The first three issues relate to the provisions in the AICTE Handbook and the last issue is with reference to the AICTE Regulations. Therefore, list these matters on 17.3.2011 to enable AICTE to put forth its stand on these four issues and to hear the petitioners regarding the interim prayer. In the meanwhile, petitioners are directed to complete the service.
(O.P. Sharma) (M.S. Negi)
Court Master Court Master