Union Of India vs. Shri Radhakrishna Rice Mill

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA <u> BECTION,</u> KVIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION LISTED ON $12.3.12$ <u>LD. FIEGISTHAFI GOUFLT:</u> ITEM No. THANSFER PETITION (GIVIL) NO. (Y) $DEZ01$ Satinder Kair Nand Kirhore Nange & Ors ....Pelilloner VEASUS ...Respondent < OFFICE REPORT The Transfer Pelition above mentioned was listed before the Hon ble Court / td. $\mathbb{R}^k$ Registror Court on $\mathcal{U} \cap \mathcal{U}$ , 201, when the Court / he was granted / directed . before Dela is enclosed. TEADY / FORTHE REASON: <u>NOT</u> Accordingly, Notice was issued to the sole Respondent through Registered A.D. no leon _as-well-as-Dash / Huaugh-MarCourl-It is submitted that unserved cover containing the notice it as been received It is submitted that neither A.D. Card nor unserved cover has been received buck from sele respondents o far. Il is submitted that A.D. Card duly signed by the sole Respondent has been. 小. seceived but no one has filed Valcolainia and hiemo of appearance on his behalf ון וא subtribed that Service Report has been received from the moli-count sluting $\frac{1}{2}$ therein their CRespondent No. Angs not filed Allidoril of service of dash notice. The counsel the RNO.9 has not folid CLA. Said Mr. Nand Kernore, R-NOL has on . CA . 7 pt is aubomitier that course for the petitioner les not taken. fresh $7-15$ hence notice could not be issued to unserved RMOS 2-9 SERVICE OF NOTICE IS NOT COMPLETE. ON R. Mos. 2-4 The maller (s) : Is / are Tisted before the Court of Ld. Plegistrar with this pillce Pleport. $2010$ Copy to: Mr. P.R. B Silvaki Assistant registrari Advocale Advoeale ti Bina_n ki Das ASSISTANT HEQICTED