Kanwal Jeet Singh @ Rana vs. Pritam Kaur
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
7 Mar 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.28 COURT NO.12 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).7240/2014 (From the judgement and order dated 25/11/2013 in WP No.1729/2006 of The HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL) KANWAL JEET SINGH @ RANA Petitioner(s) VERSUS PRITAM KAUR & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for exemption from filing O.T. and deletio of proforma respondents and with prayer for interim relief ) Date: 28/03/2014 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DIPAK MISRA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Ajay K. Bhatia, Adv. Mr. Jatinder Kumar Bhatia,Adv. For Respondent(s) UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Heard. The special leave petition is dismissed. However, on the request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we allow the petitioner further period upto 30th September, 2014 to vacate the suit premises subject to filing of usual undertaking within four weeks and following conditions: (i) Petitioner shall pay arrears of rent within two months, if any, in favour -2-
of respondents and deposit the amount in the account of the respondents, number of which may be provided by the respondents or by way of bank draft;
(ii) The petitioner will pay occupancy charges for the month of March,2014 onwards @ Rs.1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) per month on the 7th day of the subsequent month;
(iii)The petitioner shall not create any third party interest on the suit premises including that of his sons and relatives.
On failure of any of the condition it will be open to the respondents to move before this Court for initiating contempt proceedings against the petitioner.
f
[ Neeta ] [ Usha Sharma] Sr. P.A. Court Master