Trinity Infraventures Ltd. Through P. S. Parthasarthy, Director vs. The State Of Telangana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Hon'ble Aravind Kumar
Stage:
AFTER NOTICE (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
Disposed off
Listed On:
27 Mar 2023
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.30 COURT NO.2 SECTION XII-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Miscellaneous Application No.455-457/2022 in SLP(C) No. 24590- 24592/2018
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 05-10-2018 in SLP(C) No.24590/2018 05-10-2018 in SLP(C) No. No. 24591/2018 05- 10-2018 in SLP(C) No. No. 24592/2018 passed by the Supreme Court Of India)
M/S TRINITY INFRAVENTURES LTD. THROUGH P.S. PARTHASARTHY, DIRECTOR Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF TELANGANA Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION and IA No.27889/2022-CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION )
Date : 27-03-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR
| For Petitioner(s) | Mr. Puneet Bali, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Mandeep Kalra, AOR<br>Ms. Radhika Narula, Adv.<br>Ms. Divya Singh Pundir, Adv.<br>Ms. Kanak Malik, Adv.<br>Mr. Rishabh Lekhi, Adv.<br>Ms. Tanya Singh, Adv.<br>Ms. Anushna Satapathy, Adv.<br>Mr. Aditya Soni, Adv. |
|---|---|
| For Respondent(s) | Mr. C.S. Vaidyanathan, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Adv.<br>Ms. Pallavi, Adv.<br>Mr. Duvvuri Subrahmanya Bhanu, Adv.<br>Mr. Rajiv Kumar Choudhary, Adv. |
| Mr. A. Sirajuddin, Sr. Adv.<br>Mr. Aakarshan Aditya, AOR | |
| Mr. Anand Sanjay M Nuli, Adv.<br>Mr. Suraj Kaushik, Adv.<br>Mr. Nanda Kumar K.B., Adv.<br>Mr. Dharam Singh, Adv.<br>Ms. Akhila Wali, Adv. |
Mr. Shiva Swaroop, Adv.
M/S. Nuli & Nuli, AOR
M/S. Venkat Palwai Law Associates, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
Learned senior counsel confines to the prayer (iii) which is a direction to the High Court to expeditiously dispose of the final decree proceedings.
We are of the view that the High Court will naturally make every endeavour to dispose it of as early as possible.
Insofar as prayer (i) and (ii) are concerned, learned counsel submits that he will make necessary submissions before the High Court in accordance with law.
The IA and the Miscellaneous Applications stand disposed of.
(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID) ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)