Selvaraj vs. R. Nagarajan
AI Summary
The Supreme Court, while hearing a Special Leave Petition in a mentioning list, found no urgency in the matter. This procedural order means the case will proceed through regular channels without immediate special listing, indicating the court's view on the necessity of an expedited hearing.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
Respondent's Counsel
Advocates on Record
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
Selvaraj filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19096/2023 in the Supreme Court of India, challenging a final judgment and order dated August 26, 2022, passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras in CRPPD No. 1496/2021. The matter was brought before a Division Bench of the Supreme Court for urgent mentioning on October 3, 2024.
Timeline of Events
Madras High Court passed impugned final judgment and order in CRPPD No. 1496/2021.
Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 19096/2023 filed in Supreme Court of India.
SLP called on in the Mentioning List before the Supreme Court.
Key Factual Findings
There appears to be no urgency in the matter.
Source: Current Court Finding
Primary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioner's counsel, Ms. Aditi Anil Dani, appeared, but no specific argument seeking urgency was recorded in the order from their side.
Respondent's Arguments
Counsel for the respondent, Mr. Siddharth Naidu, made a mention, but the content of their submission regarding urgency or lack thereof was not detailed in the order.
Court's Reasoning
The Court's decision not to grant urgency was based on its assessment that there were no compelling reasons presented or evident in the matter to warrant immediate listing or hearing.
- Strict Adherence to Procedure
Impugned Orders
Specific Directions
- 1.There appears to be no urgency in the matter.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This order is a brief procedural pronouncement regarding urgency in listing and does not involve any substantive legal determination or interpretation that would set a binding precedent.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Registrar
Stage:
SERVICE/COMPLIANCE-BEFORE REGISTRAR(J)
Remarks:
List After (Weeks) [4], List before court/bench
Listed On:
13 Aug 2024
In:
Registrar
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.804 COURT NO.8 SECTION XII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 19096/2023
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 26-08-2022 in CRPPD No. 1496/2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras)
SELVARAJ Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
R. NAGARAJAN & ORS. Respondent(s)
Date : 03-10-2024 This petition was called on in the Mentioning List today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.K. MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
For Petitioner(s)
Ms. Aditi Anil Dani , AOR
For Respondent(s)
Mr. Siddharth Naidu, Adv. (Mentioned by) M/S. Ksn & Co., AOR
UPON a mention being made by counsel for respondent the Court made the following O R D E R
- There appears to be no urgency in the matter.
(NIDHI AHUJA) (NAND KISHOR) AR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
