Uddar Gagan Properties(P) Ltd vs. Santosh Kumari

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.2 SECTION IV (HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No.5072/2016

UDDAR GAGAN PROPERTIES LTD Appellant(s)

VERSUS

SANT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)

(IA No.102644/2019 – FOR CLARIFICATION/DIRECTION; and, IA No.141678/2021 – FOR RECALLING THE COURT'S ORDER)

WITH

C.A. Nos.5079-5085/2016 (IV) C.A. Nos.5086/2016 (IV) C.A. Nos.5073-5077/2016 (IV) C.A. Nos. 5087-5099/2016 (IV) C.A. No. 5100/2016 (IV) Diary No.13912/2021 (IV) (IA No.89613/2021 – FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING)

Date : 06-12-2021 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT

Counsel for the Parties:

Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv./Amicus Curiae Mr. Kunal Chatterjee, AOR Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv. Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. Mr. Rohan Anand, Adv. Mr. Kanhaiya Singhal, AOR Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Sr. Adv. Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Vaibhav Tomar, Adv. Mr. Anirudh Singh, Adv.

Mr. Tushar Mehta, SG Mr. Anil Grover, Sr. AAG Mr. Amit Kumar, AAG Mr. Rahul Khurana, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Babita Mishra, Adv. Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Sandeep Kumar Mahapatra, Adv. Ms. Swarupama Chaturvedi, Adv. Mr. Amrish Kumar, AOR Mr. M.L. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Minakshi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Mr. M.L. Sharma, Adv. Ms. Minakshi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Sushil K. Sharma, Adv. Mr. S. L. Aneja, AOR Mr. D. N. Goburdhun, AOR Ms. Gauri Goburdhun, Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Ms. Anubha Agrawal, AOR M/s. Karanjawala & Co., AOR Mr. Sunil Roy, AOR Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Vijay K. Jain, AOR Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

At the joint request of the learned counsel for the parties, list the matters for final disposal on 06.01.2022, at the end of the Board.

In the meantime, State of Haryana is at liberty to place on record its response to the Report submitted by the learned Amicus Curiae.

(MUKESH NASA) (VIRENDER SINGH) COURT MASTER BRANCH OFFICER