Uddar Gagan Properties(P) Ltd vs. Santosh Kumari

ITEM NO.1 COURT NO.10 SECTION IV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Civil Appeal No(s). 5072/2016

UDDAR GAGAN PROPERTIES LTD Appellant(s)

VERSUS

SANT SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

C.A. No. 5086/2016 (IV)

C.A. No. 5079-5085/2016 (IV)

C.A. No. 5073-5077/2016 (IV)

C.A. No. 5087-5099/2016 (IV)

C.A. No. 5100/2016 (IV)

Date : 16-03-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

Mr. Jaideep Gupta, Sr. Adv. (A.C.) Mr. Kunal Chatterji, Adv. Mr. Abhishek Sankritik, Adv.

For Appellant(s) Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv. Mr. Sahil Monga, Adv. Ms. Kanika Agnihotri, Adv. Mrs. Manok Karanjawla, Adv. for M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR

Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, AOR Ms. Ritu Rastogi, Adv. Ms. Sasmita Tripathy, Adv.

Ms. Anubha Agrawal, AOR Digitally signed by SWETA DHYANI Date: 2018.03.17 12:54:33 IST Reason: Signature Not Verified

Mr. Preshit Surshe, Adv. Mr. Anish R. Shah, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. P.S. Narsimha, ASG. (N.P.) Mr. Shadman Ali, Adv.

Ms. Binu Tamta, Adv. Mr. Rohit Rao, Adv. Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Adv. Mrs. Anil Katiyar, Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri, AOR Mr. Rohit Rao N., Adv. Mr. Mukund P. Unny, Adv. Mr. Anil Grover, Adv. Mr. Satish Kumar, Adv. Mr. Shivam Kumar, Adv. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Visen, Adv. Mr. S. L. Aneja, AOR Mr. Kamal Mohan Gupta, AOR Ms. Anubha Agrawal, AOR Dr. Kailash Chand, AOR Mr. Gaurav Sharma, AOR Mr. Rajat Sharma, Adv. Mr. Subhasish Bhowmick, AOR Mr. S.L. Ahuja, Adv. Mr. D. N. Goburdhan, AOR Mr. Sunil Roy, AOR Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, AOR Mr. Ajay Pal, AOR Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AOR Mr. Nayan Nepal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

We have perused the report filed by the State of Haryana in pursuance of order of this Court dated 13.05.2016.

Mr. Vijay K. Jain, AOR

Sh. Jaideep Gupta, learned Amicus has informed the Court that substantial compliance of the order has been taken. However,

2

he has pointed out that the possession of 21 acres of land has not been taken on the ground that there are some subsequent orders of the High Court.

Learned counsel for the State submits that he will furnish the particulars of the said 21 acres of land and why possession thereof has not been taken up in spite of judgment of this Court. If there are any orders passed by the High Court, copies thereof may also be filed.

It is further pointed out that documents with regard to land other than 253.9 acres have not been furnished. Let the State of Haryana furnish the same within two weeks from today.

As regards inquiry into the legality and bonafides of the acts of the persons responsible, learned counsel for the State submits that an Officer was appointed who has given a report but the State Government has not accepted the said report and proposes to take further action.

Let the State Government file further affidavit in this regard.

The fourth compliance report may be filed within two weeks.

List the matters on April 10, 2018.

(SWETA DHYANI) (PARVEEN KUMARI PASRICHA) SENIOR PERSONAL ASSISTANT BRANCH OFFICER

3