Palam Potteries vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
4 Apr 2003
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).6093/2003
(From the judgement and order dated 13/02/2003 in CWP No. 2672/1996 of The HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT N. DELHI)
RAVI KHULLAR & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(With appln(s) for directions and impleadment and permission for urging addl. facts and intervention and with prayer for interim relief and office report )) (For Final Disposal) WITH SLP(C) NO. 6095 of 2003 (With appln.(s) for directions and intervention and with prayer for interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) SLP(C) NO. 6384 of 2003 (With appln.(s) for intervention and with prayer for interim relief and office report)(For Final Disposal) SLP(C) NO. 8574 of 2003 (With appln.(s) for direction and impleadment of the applicants as petitioners and intervention and with prayer for interim relief and office report) (For Final Disposal) Date: 26/04/2006 This Petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.P. SINGH
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALTAMAS KABIR
For Petitioner(s) Mr. J.L. Gupta, Sr. Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, Sr. Adv. Mr. D.A. Dave, Sr. adv. Mr. Nidhesh Gupta, Adv. Mr. Vinod Shukla, adv. Ms. S. Janani,Adv. Mr. U.U. Lalit, Sr. Adv. Mr. Baljit choudhary, Adv. Ms. Lalit Mohini Bhat, adv. Mr. Naveen R. Nath, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. Mrs.Rachana Joshi Issar,Adv. Ms. Geeta Luthra, Adv. Ms. Pinky Anand, Adv. Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, adv. Ms. Jhujhum Sarkar, Adv. Mr. D.N. Goburdhan ,Adv ...2/- - 2 - Mr. V.B. Saharya, Adv. for M/S Saharya & Co. ,Advs. Mr. Vikas Singh, ASG Mrs. Indra Sawhney, Adv. Mr. Vikas Sharma, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Sr. adv. Mr. Atul Sharma, Adv. Mr. M.A.Chinnasamy ,Adv
UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following
O R D E R
It is stated before us that the representations of the petitioners for grant of alternative
sites has been rejected and the order communicated to them. Th ey would like to file an additional
affidavit in the nature of reply to the order rejecting their representa tions.
Let this matter come up on 3rd May, 2006.
(Ajay Kr. Jain) (Vijay Dhawan)
Court Master Court Master
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order