Atul Dev vs. Union Of India
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Fixed Date by Court
Before:
Hon'ble A.M. Khanwilkar, Hon'ble Dinesh Maheshwari, Hon'ble C.T. Ravikumar
Stage:
FRESH (FOR ADMISSION) - CIVIL CASES
Remarks:
List On (Date) [30-09-2021]
Listed On:
23 Sept 2021
In:
Judge
Category:
UNKNOWN
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.1 Court 3 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
CIVIL APPEAL Diary No(s). 5221/2021
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 15-02-2021 in CAAT No. 94/2020 15-02-2021 in CAAT No. 95/2020 passed by the National Company Law Apellate Tribunal)
RAJEEV SABHARWAL & ANR. Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)
(IA No.30433/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.30434/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.30428/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL and IA No.30432/2021- APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS )
WITH
Diary No(s). 5593/2021 (XVII) ( IA No.32684/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.32682/2021-STAY APPLICATION and IA No.32681/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE APPEAL) C.A. No. 2856/2021 (XVII) ( IA No.84756/2021-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.84755/2021-APPROPRIATE ORDERS/DIRECTIONS and IA No.86408/2021-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS/ANNEXURES)
Date : 23-09-2021 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MAHESHWARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.T. RAVIKUMAR
For Petitioner(s) Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Sr. Adv. Mr. Saket Sikri, Adv. Mr. Avishkar Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Aor Mr. Nipun Katyal, Adv. Mr. Nikhil Singhvi, Adv. Mr. Vikalp Mudgal, Adv. Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR
Ms. Rohini Musa, AOR M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR
Mr. Arun Kathpalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv. Ms. Ruby Singh Ahuja, Adv Mr. Gaurav Liberhan, Adv Mr. Jatin Mongia, Adv Ms. Deepti Sarin, Adv Ms. Tahira Karanjawala, Adv Mr. Anmol Jassal, Adv Mr. Utkarsh Maria, Adv Mr. Vasu Singh, Adv For Respondent(s) Mr. Tushar Mehta, SGI Mr. K.M. Nataraj, ASG Mr. Kanu Agrawal, Adv Ms. Neela Kedar Gokhale, Adv Mr. Sughosh Subramanium,Adv Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Adv Mr. Arvind Kumar Sharma, AOR M/S. Karanjawala & Co., AOR M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, AOR Mr. Siddharth Batra, AOR Mr. Pulkit Deoraiii, Adv. Ms. Archna Yadaviv, Adv. Ms. Shivani Chawla, Adv. Ms. Gauri Rasgotra, Mr Vikash Kumar Jha, Ms Nikitha Shenoy, Mr Yash Johri, Mr. Sumit Attri, AOR
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
A letter has been circulated on the ground that arguing counsel is unwell. Objection has been taken thereto by the appellant in C.A. No. 2856 of 2021. The apprehension expressed by this appellant is that someone is trying to destroy or manipulate the record in the office of the Gymkhana.
It is not necessary for us to examine this grievance, at present. However, since the CCTV cameras are installed in the premises, including the office premises of the Gymkhana, we direct the Administrator to ensure that the footage/recording from today onwards be preserved till further order, to be passed by this Court.
List these matters on 30.09.2021.
It is made clear that no request for adjournment on the ground of non-availability of the arguing counsel will be entertained, at the instance of any party. They are free to make necessary arrangement, if the Court wishes to proceed with the matter on the next date.
(DEEPAK SINGH) (VIDYA NEGI)
COURT MASTER (SH) COURT MASTER (NSH)