Sweta Sahu vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
11 Mar 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
ITEM NO.21 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) …………...Diary No(s).5566/2022
(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2022 in MCRC No.2620/2022 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior)
SWETA SAHU Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)
(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.30658/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.30659/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.30669/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.30656/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))
Date : 11-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.
CORAM :
Signature Not Verified
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI
For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Ms. Anushree Shukla, Adv. Mr. Mayank Goutam, Adv. Mr. Ashu Bhindwar, Adv. Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR
For Respondent(s)
UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R
The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.
The application for permission to file the special leave petition is allowed.
The application for exemption from filing affidavit is also allowed.
Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and on carefully perusing the material placed on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court granting bail to respondent No.2 herein. Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2022.03.11 17:09:17 IST Reason:
The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.
(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN)
DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)