Sweta Sahu vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Court:Supreme Court of India
Judge:Hon'ble Hon'Ble The Chief Justice
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:11 Mar 2022
CNR:SCIN010055662022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Case Registered

Listed On:

11 Mar 2022

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

ITEM NO.21 Court 1 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II-A

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) …………...Diary No(s).5566/2022

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 28-01-2022 in MCRC No.2620/2022 passed by the High Court of M.P. at Gwalior)

SWETA SAHU Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ANR. Respondent(s)

(FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.30658/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.30659/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. and IA No.30669/2022-EXEMPTION FROM FILING AFFIDAVIT and IA No.30656/2022-PERMISSION TO FILE PETITION (SLP/TP/WP/..))

Date : 11-03-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

Signature Not Verified

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Prashant Shukla, Adv. Ms. Anushree Shukla, Adv. Mr. Mayank Goutam, Adv. Mr. Ashu Bhindwar, Adv. Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh, AOR

For Respondent(s)

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

The Court is convened through Video Conferencing.

The application for permission to file the special leave petition is allowed.

The application for exemption from filing affidavit is also allowed.

Having heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and on carefully perusing the material placed on record, we see no reason to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court granting bail to respondent No.2 herein. Digitally signed by SATISH KUMAR YADAV Date: 2022.03.11 17:09:17 IST Reason:

The special leave petition is, accordingly, dismissed. As a sequel to the above, pending interlocutory applications also stand disposed of.

(SATISH KUMAR YADAV) (R.S. NARAYANAN)

DEPUTY REGISTRAR COURT MASTER (NSH)