Anand Rai& Ors. vs. Madhya Pradesh And Ors. Public Health And Family Welfare Department Secretary

\224 ITEM NO.9 COURT NO.7 SECTION PIL S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 33 OF 2012 SWASTHYA ADHIKAR MANCH, INDORE & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS MIN.OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELF. & ORS. Respondent(s) (With appln(s) for directions and impleadment as party respondent and office report) WITH W.P(C) NO. 79 of 2012 (With office report) Date: 16/07/2012 These Petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.M. LODHA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE For Petitioner(s) W.P. 33/2012 Mr. Sanjay Parikh, Adv. Mr. Pukhrambam Ramesh Kumar,Adv. Mr. A.N. Singh, Adv. Ms. Mamta Saxena, Adv. Mr. Bushra Praveen, Adv. W.P. 79/2012 Mr. Colin Gonsalves, Sr. Adv. Mr. Jayshree Satpute, Adv. Ms.Jyoti Mendiratta, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. T.S. Doabia, Sr. Adv. Ms. Sadhana Sandhu, Adv. Mr. Surinder Saini, Adv. Mr. Manpreet Singh Doabia, Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra ,Adv Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija ,Adv Mr. Amit Kumar ,Adv. Mr. Atul Kumar, Adv. Ms. Rekha Bakshi, Adv. Mr. Avijit Mani Tripathi, Adv. For Applicant(s) (I.A.3/2012 in Mr. Uday U. Lalit, Sr. Adv. W.P.(C)33/2012) Ms. Krishna Sarmai, Adv. Ms. Manisha Singh, Adv. Mr. Navnit Kumar, Adv. Mr. Ranjit Chaddha, Adv. for M/S Corporate Law Group UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following O R D E R

Mr. T.S. Doabia, learned senior counsel for respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3, Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for respondent No. 4, and Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, learned counsel for respondent No. 5, pray for some more time for filing counter affidavits on behalf of respective parties. They may do so within six weeks from today.

Rejoinder may be filed by the petitioners within two weeks thereafter.

List the matter on October 8, 2012.

Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 in WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(s). 33 OF 2012

Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 has been made by the applicant - Indian Society for Clinical Research - for its impleadment as party respondent in the Writ Petition. Having regard to the subject matter involved in the Writ Petition, Mr. Sanjay Parikh, learned counsel for the petitioners, has no objection if the applicant is allowed to intervene in the matter.

We, accordingly, permit the applicant - Indian Society for Clinical Research - to intervene in the matter.

Interlocutory Application No. 3 of 2012 is disposed of accordingly.

W.P(C) NO. 79 of 2012

Ms. Vibha Datta Makhija, Advocate, appears for respondent Nos. 1 and 5, Mr. D.S. Mahra, Advocate, appears for respondent Nos. 2 and 3, and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate, appears for respondent No. 4. Thus, service on all the respondents is complete.

Respondents may file their counter affidavits within six weeks from today. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed by the petitioners within two weeks thereafter.

List the Writ Petition along with Writ Petition (C) No. 33 of 2012 on October 8, 2012.

|(RAJESH DHAM) | |(RENU DIWAN) | |COURT MASTER | |COURT MASTER |