Central Council Of Indian Medicine vs. Ved Prakash Tyagi
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
19 Feb 2014
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).5230/2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/02/2014 in SA No. 15/2014 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital) CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE Petitioner(s) VERSUS VED PRAKASH TYAGI & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln. (s) for direction/modification) (For final disposal) WITH SLP(C) No. 10475-10476/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report) SLP(C) No. 14510/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions and exemption from filing O.T. and exemption from filing OT and permission to file additional documents and interim relief and office report) Date : 29/09/2015 These petitions were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL For Petitioner(s) Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. R.Venkataramani,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh,Adv. Mr. Parag P. Tripathi,Adv. Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi,Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat,Adv. For Respondent(s) Signature Not Verified Mr. U.K. Uniyal,Sr.Adv. Mr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv. Digitally signed by Sarita Purohit Date: 2015.10.07 16:58:56 IST Reason: shifted by anita 1
¾ ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.3 SECTION X
Mr. Sanjeeb Sen,Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv.
Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv.
Mr. T. Gopal,Adv.
Mr. Dilip Lr.Nayak,Adv.
Mr. Hemendra Sharma,Adv.
Mr. Pawan Kr. Saini,Adv. Ms. Neha Meena,Adv. Ms. Madhurima Ghosh,Adv. Mr. K. Radha Krishna,Sr.Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat,Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta,Adv. Mr. Rajiv Singh,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. Mr. R.S. Nagar,Adv. Mr. D.S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Mr. R.Venkataramani,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Singh Bundela,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Adv. Ms. Neelam Singh,Adv. Mr. Prateek Dwivedi,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singh,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R We do not find any substance in these petitions. The special leave petitions are, accordingly, Ad-interim relief, if any, stands vacated. However, all legally permissible contentions may be raised before the High Court. Parties are at liberty to approach the High Court with a suitable application, if Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
dismissed.
necessary.
(Anita Malhotra) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar
2