Central Council Of Indian Medicine vs. Ved Prakash Tyagi

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).5230/2014

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 10/02/2014 in SA No.15/2014 passed by the High Court Of Uttarakhand At Nainital)

CENTRAL COUNCIL OF INDIAN MEDICINE Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

VED PRAKASH TYAGI & ORS Respondent(s) (With appln.(s) for direction/modification) (For final disposal)

WITH

SLP(C) Nos.10475-10476/2014 (With appln.(s) for permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report)

SLP(C)No.14510/2014 (With appln.(s) for directions, exemption from filing official English translation, exemption from filing O.T., permission to file additional documents and Interim Relief and Office Report)

Date : 01/05/2015 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL R. DAVE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL

For Petitioner(s) Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi,Adv. Mr. Chirag M. Shroff,Adv. Ms. Mahima Shroff,Adv. Ms. Swati Vaibhav,Adv. Mr. Vikash Sinha,Adv. Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi,Sr.Adv. Mr. Ashok Panigrahi,Adv. Mr. Santosh Kumar,Ad.v Ms. Ashmi Mohan,Adv. Mr. Yashraj Bundela,Adv. Ms. Tasneem Ahmadi,Adv. Mr. Shadan Farasat,Adv.

For Respondent(s)

Mr. Ranjit Kumar,SG Mr. K. Radhakrishnan,Sr.Adv. Ms. Binu Tamta,Adv. Mr. S.S. Rawat,Adv. Ms. Sunita Sharma,Adv. For D.S. Mahra,Adv. Ms. Sushma Suri,Adv.(Not present) Mr. U.K. Uniyal,Sr.Adv. Dr. Abhishek Atrey,Adv. Mr. Sumit Rajora,Adv. Mr. Sanjeeb Sen,Sr.Adv. Mr. Farrukh Rasheed,Adv. Ms. Aishwarya Bhati,Adv. Mr. Hemendra,adv. Mr. Gopal,Adv. Ms. Rashmi Singh,Adv.

Mr. Prateek Dwivedi,Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following O R D E R Mr. Rakesh Dwivedi, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Ashok Panigrahi, Advocate-on-Record for Respondent No.1 in SLP(C)No.5230/2014 (Ved Prakash Tyagi), makes a statement that during the pendency of these petitions, Respondent No.1 would like to practice as an Ayurvedic Doctor only in the State of Uttarakhand, he does not want to contest the election and he would like to challenge the validity of order dated 6th May, 2013 passed by the Indian Medicine Council, Uttrakhand, before the Central Council of Indian Medicine.

In view of the afore-stated circumstances, implementation of the order dated 6th May, 2013 is stayed. Respondent No.1 is permitted to practice in the State of Uttarakhand as an Ayurvedic Doctor.

2

Respondent Nos.3 and 6 in SLP(C)No.14510/2014 are represented in other connected petitions, hence service is complete in all the matters

List the matters for final disposal on a Nonmiscellaneous day in the month of January, 2016.

(Sarita Purohit) (Sneh Bala Mehra) Court Master Assistant Registrar